The Shawshank Redemption (Two-Disc Special Edition) Reviews

• Although not a special edition, still a fine DVD

  
  By A2K53J3MLTXFB3 on 1999-12-22
  The Movie:

  Every so often in everyone's life, they walk out of a movie that they consider perfect. A movie where you don't sit through it and think to yourself how you might have done it all differently had you been the director. I have a couple of movies like that, and "The Shawshank Redemption" is one of them. I still remember clearly walking out of the theater in 1994 and thinking that I've just seen one of the best movies that I'll ever have the pleasure of sitting through. A movie so elegant and emotional that is perfect in its way of storytelling. A movie that is about how hope can never die. The movie earned several Academy Award nominations that were certainly well-deserved, but it left theaters all too quickly. Over the years though, it has gained a strong cult following.

  The movie stars Tim Robbins in one of his very best performances as Andrew Dufresne, a quiet man who is convicted of the murder of his wife and is sent to Shawshank prison. It's there he meets "Red", a convict played by Morgan Freeman who gets things from the outside for a price. He first sees Andy as he's lead into the prison and predicts that he won't last long inside the prison walls. Over time though, he's suprised that the young man is able to survive and soon, the two become friends with respect for each other. Andy is not a man who "fights the system". He spends his days in his own quiet world, a courage that the other prisoners don't quite understand at first. Robbins has built this character in a way that we the performance is not showy, but subtle. The result is that we want to know more and when we do begin to understand his ways, that only makes us want him to succeed that much more. I won't go into much more in the way of detail about the movie; if you haven't seen it, I don't want to ruin any of the enjoyment of the movie; if you have, I'm sure you already have your feelings about the movie. This is a movie that's not depressing; it has a lot of life to it and I think that when they look back at the 90's, they will see that this is one of the best pictures that was released during this time.

  Yes, Warner Brothers has proven to made an error in judgement about their way of going about putting this DVD out. There was an announcement over a year ago, I believe; then previous announcements came later after the first delay promising a director's commentary, then a Morgan Freeman commentary, then, in the final moments before the DVD is released this week...nothing. It's a shame, as "Shawshank" is a film deserving of much more. I suppose part of me is happy with the fact that this film is finally on DVD, although if this is the final product, there is no reason in my mind that this couldn't have been released a long, is an excellent looking image. One of the best cinematographers in the business (Roger Deakins- "Fargo") did the filming on this picture and the pale colors are represented well throughout the picture, mainly browns and greys. Like the movie, there is an elegance to the visual style on this picture that is apparent in every movie that Deakins has worked on. Images are clear and crisp throughout; sharp, but not overly sharp for a "smooth" feeling that looks very film-like.

  There are few problems, and none of them are terribly distracting at all. There is a slight shimmering in a scene or two and some very small instances of grain. Other than that, this is an excellent looking image that will certainly beautiful sound mix. It's also a newly remastered 5.1 mix. It's not flashy or showy, nor does it need to be. It does however, do what it needs to do best very well. The score by Thomas Newman is absolutely wonderful and it sounds clear and crisp throughout the picture. Surrounds are put into use occasionally, but always in a subtle way that is right for the picture. What I was pleased about most though, was how rich and clean the score sounded on this DVD. Dialogue is clear and without problems as well. Again, Non-animated main menus that have the score playing in the dissapointment of this DVD; all that's included is the trailer and some production stills.

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Final Thoughts Although it's unfortunate that this isn't the special edition that it should have been it is a must for any collection. I'm happy the film is finally being realized by more and more people as a classic piece of filmmaking, which I've always considered it to be.
  
  

• The Most Satisfying Ending In Motion Picture History

  
  By A1Q329PGKOGLDD on 2000-07-14
  The Shawshank Redemption is by far, one of the greatest movies of all time. It is ultimate story of how hope truly never dies, and how good things finally happen to good people.

  Tim Robbins, in his finest acting job to date, plays the wrongly convicted Andrew Dufresne. He is sent to Shawshank Prison for killing his wife and her lover, and there he meets Red, played by the ever talented (and one of the best voice-over voices of all time) Morgan Freeman. The chemistry between the two is so amazing throughout the entire movie, and you can clearly see it flow.

  You really begin to feel for Andy and his quiet demeanor peppered with subtle emotions. Just when you think the movie is going a certain way, the plot takes an incredible turn that leaves you sitting there with your mouth open. From this point, just when you think the film is heading towards its almost certain climax, it twists another way, leaving you sitting there, not being able to control your giddy smile.

  The film is wonderfully written, and the actors were superb. It has a beautiful flow to it, and you can't help but enjoy the masterpiece that you are viewing. You will definately be pleasantly satisfied. This film is an excellent addition to anyone's video collection.
  
  

• The Greatest Movie Not to Win an Oscar

  
  By A2QA095LQPDBJD on 2003-06-11
  It has long been my contention that it is the moviemaker's task to hold the viewer's attention, not to burden him with his self-indulgent, difficult-to-follow symbolisms.

  That having been said, I find it difficult to find another movie I would recommend more highly than The Shawshank Redemption. Without any high-adrenaline action sequences or steamy sex scenes (two sure-fire ways to get the vewer's attention), this film somehow has the power to make you sit through all 142 minutes without for a moment getting bored. And I challenge anyone who has seen it to delete any scene, even any minute, from the final edit. The fact is, you can't. Because every single scene is an essential element that contributes to the final result: a masterpiece that captures the drama of enduring friendship and resiliency of the human spirit more powerfully than any other film ever made. Even those who normally do not watch movies with a critical eye will find themselves so drawn into this experience. I really can't say enough about this film. Suffice it to say that this is certainly the Greatest Movie Not to Win an Oscar. (Since Citizen Kane, at least. )

  Actually, I can forgive the Film Academy for not honoring this film with the Oscars I firmly believe it deserved. But when the American Film Institute in 1998 put together their list of The 100 Greatest Movies of all time (covering the period from 1896-1996), and so myopically overlooked Shawshank in favor of such titles as Rocky, Dr. Strangelove, Network, and Jaws, well, I thought that was absolutely ridiculous.

  I wouldn't hesitate to put it in the top five of all time.
  
  

• Plodding, over=done, stereotypical prison picture

  
  By A248OBQ0UUN6VL on 2001-12-11
  Hey, sorry but it is true. The Shawshank Redemption is nothing more but a modern day update of a 1930's prison picture. Lets see....
  1.) Innocent man sent to jail for crime he did not commit
  2.) Crooked guards
  3.) Malignant Warden who manipulates prisoners and the system
  4.) Saintly fellow convicts who spout metaphysical wisdom like Grandpa on Walton's mountain.
  5.) Edgy violence when hero is attacked by fellow inmates (supposed to show the terror of everyman).
  6.) Hero appears to be co-opted by the system but then tiumphs with a semi-spiritual redemption leading to the come-uppence of his tormentors.

  That pretty much sums up the plot of Shawshank, nothing but a formula picture that you have seen before. In that way I guess it is comfortable in that it breaks absolutely NO NEW GROUND, it is a re-hash of all the prison pictures that came before it.

  Shawshank Redemption? They should all get the chair as it has NO SOCIALLY REDEEMING VALUE to use the prison parlance. After all the only message I got from it was that white collar crime pays if you are slick.
  
  

• This is NOT widescreen, check for yourself!

  
  By A1MDQGJEEOFX2L on 2000-06-12
  My third submission on this, if you are doubtful, check for yourself. I own the VHS of Shawshank. I recently purchased a DVD player and Shawshank was one of my first disks. I set both the disk and the tape up to play simultaneously, and flipped back and forth to compare the superb quality improvement of DVD. I was in for a surprise. The picture DOES NOT get wider-AS IT SHOULD-and the top and bottom of the picture of the DVD version are ERASED and replaced by the black bars. The other movie I found with this flaw is Jackie Brown. Check out the point where Bridget Fonda "services" Robert DeNiro. On the VHS widescreen version , her "buns" disappear. They are fully visable on the fullscreen version! The top and bottom have been erased on the widescreen version and the picture does not get any wider. I suspect more movies have this flaw. Now that we know what to look for, let's look!
  
  
• This was one of the best videos I have ever seen
  By A2HB1IGHAGZNPA on 1999-12-06
  Well I would have to admit to everyone that this has to be the best movie I have ever seen. It really makes you feel a lot for these two characters Andy (Robbins) and Red (Morgan Freeman). The reason that I liked this movie was because of the terrific way that this movie keeps you involved with everything. To tell you the truth this movie doesn't have one boring part in it. The only thing wrong with this movie is well to tell you the truth there is nothing wrong with this movie
  
  
• One of the best movies ever deserves a better DVD.
  By A2YAABMT80RLYA on 2002-10-01
  If I were to rate this based on the movie alone, it would get 5 stars, no contest. But the fact that the DVD is so unremarkable drags the rating down much lower than the movie deserves. Keep reading and you'll see my reasons.

  I cannot praise the movie well enough, since it is one of my all time favorites. It tells the story of Andy Defresne (Tim Robbins), a banker who was wrongfully convicted of murder, and spent 19 years in prison for it. During his time, he befriends a pretty, but intellegent, crook (Morgan Freeman), and their bond solidifies as the years grow. Dufresne himself makes a difference in almost all the prisoner's lives, by showing that the cruelty of the prison cannot darken his will and spirit. It is an inspiring movie, it's almost hard to believe that it is based on a Stephen King story. Everything about the movie fits, the acting, the writing, and the entertainment. It is an exceptional movie.

  Why is it that Warner decided to release this great movie in DVD devoid of quality extras. Next to one theatrical trailer, some totally uninteresting filographies, and a paper-thin photo gallery, there is nothinh else of interest beside the movie itself. There are no commentaries, no featurettes, and no insight from the filmmakers. Basically, everything you would want is not included on the DVD. But worse yet is the packaging. I don't know why Warner thinks that it's a good idea to sell DVDs in those cheap "Snapper" cased (The thin cardboard with a plastic frame that 'snaps' on the side), because it will not last long without getting dinged and scratched. As a principle, I refuse to buy movies in "Snapper" cases. This was the one exception.

  If you already have the VHS version, the only real incentive to get the DVD is the anamorphic widescreen transfer, which gives the picture a crisp, clear look. The sound quality is also nicely kicked up, and it's a special benefit to those with surround sound, because it's the next best thing to actually being in the theatre.

  One of the biggest qualms I have with the standard of DVDs today is that second-rate movies get the 2-disc "all inclusive" DVD treatment, while brilliant movies like "The Shawshank Redemption" get the minimalist, barren treatment. I am hoping that they will release a special edition DVD sometime in the near future, because this is not the "definitave edition" of the movie. Fingers crossed.
  
  

• Perfection...
  By A3ODVYRIERNB4O on 1999-12-03
  It's hard to imagine the film that exceeds this one in quality. If I were a member of the Academy, I would have voted this film Best Picture over "Forrest Gump" in 1994. The story is original, engrossing, and ranges from funny to tragic, as it takes us through the trials and tribulations of an innocent man sent to Shawshank Prison. The acting is superb and the film ends magnificently. A must buy for fans of excellent dramas.
  
  
• Great Film, Less than stellar DVD
  By A1OB8IXL5OQPD3 on 2002-06-03
  This may be my all time favorite film, which is why I have the most trouble understanding why it recieved only minimal treatment in the DVD format. With all the great "Special Editions" and "Criterion Collection" films that have come out, films that are worthy of true in-depth exploration, why hasn't Shawshank gotten its proper DVD release for the people who love this film. I try to get the most for my DVD dollar, and love DVD's for the "behind the scenes", "making of", "directors/actors commentary" "alternate endings", "storyboards" special features. Shawshank doesn't have any of these to speak of....just production stills and trailer. This edition is really a glorified VHS copy, and that is a true shame....a big let-down for me.
  
  
• The element and etymology of Hope. . .
  By A9QQ4HE8DDW6Q on 1999-12-03
  Although Shawshank Redemption is an outstanding, almost mystical tale of desperation tuned redemption, it is necessary to understand the etymology of Hope as it derived from the original story "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption." As it is, Stephen King published a book "Different Seasons," containing four novellas, each one representing a different season of the year. "The Body" (later made into the film Stand By Me) was subtitled "fall from innocence," where the novella "Apt Pupil" (also made into a movie of the same name) was subtitled "summer of corruption." The important issue here is that "Rita Heyworth," was subtitled "hope springs eternal." This subtitle is one of the most important themes in the book, and it carries well into the movie; however, it is necessary to understand that Hope IS the theme to this story. So, no matter how much is said concerning historical accuracy, larger than life characters, et cetera, it doesn't matter. This is not a work belonging to the school Realism, but of a work that lives on as a way of life, a legend, or a map to the redemptive nature of the soul of man. Nietzche spoke of his torment and torture as spiritually rewarding, molding him into a better man; perhaps his review of "Shawshank" would be similar: the human soul, although fragile, finds redemptive power in Hope.
  
  
• Wonderful film, disappointing set
  By A39KJOCZGCM8P1 on 2004-10-06
  In no way do I mean to demean this film. It has been my favorite for a decade and will probably remain as such for a decade longer....or more.
  
  My only beef with this set is this - the extras are disappointing. What you get is three features, none of which are longer than an hour, all of which amount to the principals hamming for the camera, talking about what a wonderful film 'Shawshank' is and what an honor is was to be involved. The 'Charlie Rose' show included here, featuring Freeman, Darabont and Robbins, is the most informative about the production, but its hard to sit through four guys gabbing about a movie for an hour.
  
  That said, Darabont does a wonderful job with his commentary. However, it was NOT worth paying 18 bucks to replace my old version of Shawshank. The transfer DOES seems cleaner than my old DVD, but not 18 bucks cleaner.
  
  Personally, i would have liked a more in-depth "making-of" featurette. More behind the scenes stuff.
  
  
• clarification of June 1,2000 submission
  By A1MDQGJEEOFX2L on 2000-06-07
  I reviewed this DVD on June 1, 2000 and wish to clarify myself. The black bars at the top and bottom have ERASED the top and bottom of the movie. In effect, take a full screen movie, cover up the top and bottom with black bars, and the unwary will perceive it as a widescreen film. However, you get less movie for your money!
  
  
• A Triumph, One of the Best Movies Ever Made
  By A1GBMGSDDG7BFL on 2000-10-27
  Every so often, a certain type of movie comes along that deeply moves anyone who watches it. This movie is grand in scope and scale, its character portrayals so moving and so real, that you cannot help becoming completely engrossed by it. I believe that the Shawshank Redemption is one of these movies. Often times, movies based on books are sub par, with the common complaint being, "The book is better." Well I, for one, have read the book and watched the movie, and I assure you that the movie is not a let down at all, but rather a triumph of modern cinema. The DVD disc itself is a little thin on features, but at an average price of about $15, anyone with a DVD player and a taste for Drama(or anyone who simply likes excellent movies) should own this movie on DVD. Now, on to the movie itself. The Shawshank Redemption saw career-defining performances from many of its cast members,including Tim Robbins, who became a top star after his incredible performance, and Morgan Freeman, who added to his already impressive list of accolades with his perfect supporting role. Robbins plays Andy Dufresne, a Maine banker who is unjustly convicted of killing his wife and her lover after he discovers that she is having an affair. Andy is a true outsider in the bleak world of Shawshank prison, an educated man not used to violence and despair that are an everyday part of prison life. Robbins plays this part to perfection, showing emotional vulnerability, as well as the stregnth to overcome the greatest adversity. Freeman plays Red, "The man who can get it all," a prisoner serving a life sentence for murder, who befriends Andy. Red adapts to his life in prison by becoming a source for bringing outside goods to prisoners. The interplay between Robbins and Freeman is one of the highlights of the movie, as these two wonderful actors test each other's limits. James Whitmore plays Brooks Hatlin, a man who spends his entire life in Shawshank as a librarian. Once released,as an old man, Brooks finds that he would rather die that live another day in a unfamiliar world. His character is a tragic example of how the human mind can become so attached to its circumstances(even the blak setting of a prison) that it simply cannot let go of them. Bob Gunton takes a memorable turn as Bible-quoting Warden Samuel Norton, whose facade of morality is merely a mask for his depraved behavior and illegal activites. Frank Darabont, who wrote the screenplay and directed this movie,is a master of skilfully portraying human emotions. He deserves all the credit he gets for helping to shape this memorable movie experience. Stepen King's brilliance shines through, as his ability to create complex and memorable characters is evident in this movie. The bottom line is this: The Shawshank Redemption is a monumental achievement in motion picture history. It is defined by a memorable story, engrossing character performances, and one of the most truly gratifying endings I have ever seen in a movie. This is truly one of the greatest movies ever made.
  
  
• Great story, wondrously told and acted
  By ABN5K7K1TM1QA on 2004-05-20
  At the heart of this extraordinary movie is a brilliant and indelible performance by Morgan Freeman as Red, the man who knows how to get things, the "only" guilty man at Shawshank prison. He was nominated by the Academy for Best Actor in 1995 but didn't win. (Tom Hanks won for Forrest Gump.) What Freeman does so beautifully is to slightly underplay the part so that the eternal boredom and cynicism of the lifer comes through, and yet we can see how very much alive with the warmth of life the man is despite his confinement. Someday Morgan Freeman is going to win an Academy Award and it will be in belated recognition for this performance, which I think was a little too subtle for some Academy members to fully appreciate at the time.

  But Freeman is not alone. Tim Robbins plays the hero of the story, banker Andy Dufresne, who has been falsely convicted of murdering his wife and her lover. Robbins has a unique quality as an actor in that he lends ever so slightly a bemused irony to the characters he plays. It is as though part of him is amused at what he is doing. I believe this is the best performance of his career, but it might be compared with his work in The Player (1992), another excellent movie, and in Mystic River (2003) for which he won an Oscar as Best Supporting Actor.

  It is said that every good story needs a villain, and in the Bible-quoting, Bible-thumping, massively hypocritical, sadistic Warden Samuel Norton, played perfectly by Bob Gunton, we have a doozy. I want to tell you that Norton is so evil that fundamentalist Christians actually hate this movie because of how precisely his vile character is revealed. They also hate the movie because of its depiction of violent, predatory homosexual behavior (which is the reason the movie is rated R). On the wall of his office (hiding his safe with its ill-gotten contents and duplicitous accounts) is a framed plaque of the words "His judgment cometh and that right soon." The irony of these words as they apply to the men in the prison and ultimately to the warden himself is just perfect. You will take delight, I promise.

  Here is some other information about the movie that may interest you. As most people know, it was adapted from a novella by Stephen King entitled "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption." Rita Hayworth figures in the story because Red procures a poster of her for Andy that he pins up on the wall of his cell. The poster is a still from the film Gilda (1946) starring her and Glenn Ford. We see a clip from the black and white film as the prisoners watch, cheering and hollering when Rita Hayworth appears. If you haven't seen her, check out that old movie. She really is gorgeous and a forerunner of Marilyn Monroe, who next appears on Andy's wall in a still from The Seven Year Itch (1955). It's the famous shot of her in which her skirt is blown up to reveal her shapely legs. Following her on Andy's wall (and, by the way, these pinups figure prominently in the plot) is Rachel Welsh from One Million Years B.C. (1966). In a simple and effective device these pinups show us graphically how long Andy and Red have been pining away.

  Frank Darabont's direction is full of similar devices that clearly and naturally tell the story. There is Brooks (James Whitmore) who gets out after fifty years but is so institutionalized that he can't cope with life on the outside and hangs himself. Playing off of this is Red's periodic appearance before the parole board where his parole is summarily REJECTED. Watch how this plays out at the end.

  The cinematography by Roger Deakins is excellent. The editing superb: there's not a single dead spot in the whole movie. The difference between the good guys (Red, Andy, Brooks, etc.) and the bad guys (the warden, the guards, the "sisters," etc.) is perhaps too starkly drawn, and perhaps Andy is a bit too heroic and determined beyond what might be realistic, and perhaps the "redemption" is a bit too miraculous in how beautifully it works out. But never mind. We love it.

  All in all this is a great story vividly told that will leave you with a true sense of redemption in your soul. It is not a chick flick, and that is an understatement. It is a male bonding movie about friendship and the strength of character, about going up against what is wrong and unfair and coming out on top through pure true grit and a little luck.

  Bottom line: one of the best ever made, currently rated #2 (behind The Godfather) at the IMDb. Don't miss it.
  
  

• Deluxe treatment for a terrific movie
  By AQP1VPK16SVWM on 2004-10-06
  "The Shawshank Redemption" based on Stephen King's short novel "Rita Hayworth and The Shawshank Redemption" finally gets the deluxe treatment. This 10th Anniversary edition has a beautiful, rich, vivid and sharp transfer. While there's some minor digital blemishes, it looks remarkably crisp with a faithful reproduction of the original theatrical appearence of the movie. Although some of the darker sequences are a bit murky, the DVD compression doesn't effect the look of the movie substanially.
  
  Tim Robbins plays a banker convicted of murdering his wife and her lover on circumstanial evidence and send to Shawshank prison for two life terms. He befriends Red (Morgan Freeman)while on the inside and begins quietly trying to rebuild as close to a normal life as possible behind bars becoming a good friend to Red's circle of friends as well. Most folks are probably familiar with this well written and directed movie so I'll skip any additional summation of the plot. Besides, to reveal more would spoil the pleasure of viewing this treasure.
  
  The first disc consists of the movie with a great commentary track from writer/director Frank Darabont. Darabont discusses the difficulties in adapting King's short novel and the challenges to translating literature to the screen. He also discusses some of the changes he made to King's novel to make it work better as a dramatic presentation and the challenges of casting, performance and location shooting. It's an enlightening commentary track that educates as much as it entertains.
  
  The second disc includes "The Charlie Rose Show" segment devoted to "The Shawshank Redemption" and features Darabont, Robbins and Freeman in a great discussion on the making of the film. It's clear that all involved enjoyed working together and that atmosphere carries over to the film that they created together. We also get 2 marvelous documentaries; the first "Hope Springs Eternal: A Look Back at The Shawshank Redemption" is a marvelous featurette that covers everything from what inspired Darabont to adapt King's short novel in the first place to the rigors of producing a film at an abandoned closed prison. "Shawshank: The Redeeming Feature" examines the powerful impact of the movie and features a number of prominent critics and individuals that both discovered this powerful movie when it played in cinemas and on home video. It's not as involving as the first featurette but does give a wealth of detail about the reach and scope of a work of art when it touches an audience in a unique, personal way.
  
  We also get the comic spoof of the film "The Sharktank Redemption" which is actually quite funny. I hadn't seen this before although you'll appreciate it best after having watched the movie. Storyboards, a still gallery and the original theatrical trailer are also included. All are of top quality.
  
  The Special Edition Boxed Set includes the BFI book published on the film. It's quite a good book and would be a great reference for film buffs. It's also got a wealth of insight some of which will be worthwhile to film students and hardcore fans of the film. On the other hand, the more casual fan will probably be quite satisfied with the two DVD set. The Special Edition Boxed Set also comes with the film's original soundtrack. The marvelous score by Thomas Newman doesn't have an isolated channel (my one complaint about this DVD)on the DVD so fans of the film who also like the beautifully written but restrained music by Newman will probably want this as well. Other than these two items (and a nice box) there's no difference between the two movies.
  
  Is this a great movie? It's a well made epic film that chronicles the redemption of two very different men that end up by circumstance becoming friends. Sure, it deals in some cliches but then so do all movies. It's used as short hand. What matters is that Darabont, like King, turns some of these cliches inside out for many of these characters. This isn't a film for those expecting the latest "Jason" movie but one that demands patience as it builds the characters over time. In many respects, "The Shawshank Redemption" reminds me of Frank Capra's "It's a Wonderful Life"; it's about missed opportunities and a second chance to try and live life to the fullest again.
  
  
  
• A very well-made but ultimately MEDIOCRE film
  By A1EO7FZ8E1W7V0 on 2001-07-07
  I'm still trying to figure out why so many people absolutely LOVE this film and think it's the best ever and why it inspires such fierce loyalty. (Kinda like *the Green Mile* - but that film was positively awful :(

  Overall, I liked *The Shawshank Redemption* - key word "liked". It was entertaining, interesting, I tolerated its overly-sugary and sentimental nature well (this movie is kinda like a bowl of Fruity Pebbles for the soul :) but ....... parts of it were stupid however; no big thing. So for me that makes it an average movie.

  My personal suspicion is that as those who thought this movie to be a five star gem become less depressed and in need of sugary sentimentalized "hopeful" stories, they will see this movie more objectively and not as "the greatest and most perfect film ever in the entire history of movie-making." It will be less of an emotional rescuer or pick-me-up for them, and thereby they will be less prone to idealize and deify this movie and heap accolades on it.

  Or maybe I just need to be more emotionally in need of inspiration and hope in order to get this "remarkable" film. Could be ................
  
  

• Never rises above the hollywood platitudes
  By A2WZ1B92F81LJJ on 2002-07-21
  Gees, I'm going to get caned for saying this, aren't I.

  The Shawshank Redemption has always been pegged as a great movie - clearly the Amazon.com readership thinks so - and I finally got round to seeing it last night.

  It's definitely a engaging film; beautifully shot, well enough acted and it resolves itself quite nicely (if not a little obviously - the "twist" was so predictable it may as well have been Chubby Checker). But to my mind, the Shawshank Redemption never rises above simply "satisfactory".

  With Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman at the helm, it was always going to be a worthy sort of picture. Alas, it scores worthiness points in that numb-skulled Hollywood way, by painting the moral world in black and white. The characters are either completely virtuous, or they're thoroughly nasty. That makes the moral lesson easy to preach, but also completely undermines it, because we know the real world just isn't like that. Well, mine isn't, anyway.

  To wit: the prison gang into which wrongly convicted (of course - but how much better would the picture have been had he actually done it?) Andy Du Fresne falls - lifers, all - comprises only genuinely nice, decent, hard working, obedient folk.

  Freeman's character, Red, is an avuncular figure not a million miles from B. B. King, but who is continually, inexplicably, rejected for parole by the nasty white folk. He accepts his lot without complaint (but when he finally does speak his mind, he gets released!) Old timer Brooks (equally avuncular, but this time not a million miles from namesake Mel) is eventually paroled, but he doesn't want to leave his home of 50 years, and when pushed out in to the cruel modern world ... well, I don't want to give anything away. But it isn't hard to guess.

  The remainder of the moral lessons are the standard Hollywood fare; it's a film that attempts the epic sweep of The Dead Poets' Society, without the lyricism (but, to its credit, also without Robin Williams) and attempts to portray the brutal life of prison, without the brutality of say Sleepers.

  The hook line "you get busy livin', or you get busy dyin'!" is pure schmaltz, and I'm surprised Robbins didn't refuse point blank to deliver it. And if that wasn't bad enough, then Freeman reprises the line (only tacking on "that's goddamn right!") as the credits roll. Ugh.

  And just for those who hadn't picked it up from watching the film (or reading its title), the director helpfully gushes "it's all about redemption!" in a fairly unenlightening accompanying documentary.

  The resolution of the film may be predictable, but the manner of its arrival is nicely engineered: well plotted, Stephen King.

  And as for ending up in Zihuatanejo - great call; it's a truly beautiful place - I once went there. It's just a pity the film crew didn't. Zihuatanejo is snuggled amongst some hills in a pretty little inlet, about a hundred miles west of Acapulco. Lord only knows, then, why they filmed the final shot on an outwardly curving ocean beach, which could be anywhere on the planet BUT Zihuatanejo...
  
  

• Worst Movie Ever.
  By A23Z6RZNYDMVXC on 2004-08-31
  I'm sure no one's disputing that The Shawshank redemption is a bad movie. However, I would like to go further, and suggest that Shawshank redemption is one of the worst movie's ever made. For starters, it's got Morgan Freeman in it. Morgan Freeman(this spelling may be wrong, but I don't care) is a man of limited talents: he can play a guy hunting a serial killer, and sometimes the president, but when he tries to act he's terrible. And you know I'm right.
  Two: The film is really boring, goes on forever, covers a span of decades yet the cast never age(Morgan freeman should be dead by the end), has voiceover to explain everything, is really sentimental, everything ends ridiculously happily, he escapes in a stupid way, it actually contains the tagline "hope can set you free" and so on and so on.
  Three: The film's star, Tim Robbins, actually said it was awful. He is right and you are all wrong.
  
  
• One of the Top 10 films of All Time, A True Classic!
  By A3AKPY4LXIC24O on 2000-02-25
  One word can sum this movie up, "Wow!". But I've never been known to keep things short. I was lucky enough to see this movie in the theaters (thanks to an ingenious method of sneaking in which I will never disclose) and remember that I didn't want it to end. I can't think of another movie that has touched me so deeply. Lessons of friendship and injustice, of dignity and the power of the human will. DO NOT listen to what critic Leonard Maltin says about this movie being "overlong" and "hollow and predictable". He is under no uncertain terms nothing more than an idiot or what the British would call a "wanker". The length of the film is necessary, the story is nothing short of magic. The novella from which this is based gives all the more credence to the idea that Stephen King will one day emerge from under his undue shroud of literary cynicism as one of the 20th century's greatest writers. Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman give possibly the best performances of each of their distinguished careers. If you can handle harsh dramas and depictions of prison life then I suggest checking this movie out, putting aside any pre-conceived notions, and enjoying this timeless classic film. And when you're done go buy the movie so you don't wear out your local videostore's copies!
  
  
• Superlative Shawshank
  By A35K84RT618N3A on 1999-12-13
  The Shawshank Redemption is a character study in which the audience can develop a healthy and well-earned respect for a man whose spirit will not be crushed. We get to know these people, and writer and first-time director Frank Darabont is able to make us care for them in a way that makes the relatively slow pace of the film more than bearable. Shawshank transcends its genre much the way Cool Hand Luke did all those years ago, but while Paul Newman's Luke was a smiling, hardened con, with a longing for escape, Robbins, in a superb performance, makes Andy's intellect and imagination his salvation. It's a beautiful film that is able to portray the power of hope through the eyes of a rich and rewarding character. A man brutalized but not beaten by a corrupt system.
  
  
• A Classic
  By on 1999-11-28
  I saw this movie when it was first released and have watched it at least a dozen times since then. Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman give amazing performances. I read that Robbins really had to fight to get the role of Andy but when you watch the movie, you can't imagine anyone else playing the role. There is a scene about halfway through the movie where Freeman and Robbins are talking in the prison yard. Once you see that scene you'll see why Robbins got the part. You will know that there is no one else who could have done that scene better. It's my favorite part of the movie. Yeah, the movie itself might be a bit too long, but every scene adds to the film's greatness. The ending is well worth the wait.This movie is based on the novella "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption" from the book Different Seasons by Stephen King. I read the book before I saw the movie and I can tell you that there is nothing left out of the movie. However, if you haven't seen the movie first, watch it and then read the book so that the ending isn't spoiled. But make sure that you eventually read the book as it is among King's best.
  
  
• Triumphant celebration of the human spirit
  By A5P4JIH5SJH3U on 2002-03-23
  First off, this reviewer regularly rates this movie as his personal favourite of all time. Why only four stars then? Because we are asked to rate the DVD, not the movie, and the criminal lack of DVD extras for one of the best films ever made is shameful. So, film five stars, DVD three - averaging out at 4. Maths lesson over, on with the review.
  
  Based on the Stephen King novella ' Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption ' this really has become a modern day classic. Other films have grossed more, and may have a more immediate following, but Shawshank will endure for years, and become another 'Casablanca ' loved by generations to come.
  
  The film tells the story of Andy Dufresne, sent to the maximum security prison of Shawshank for the murder of his wife and her lover. Played with an under-stated intelligence by Tim Robbins in a career defining turn, and supported by sterling performances from Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton, William Sadler, Clancy Brown, and veteran James Whitmore. Morgan Freeman's work is particularly notable, not just for his performance ( let's face it, the man doesn't know how to give a bad one! ) but also for the fact that his is the voice of the film. His chocolate-rich tones were director Frank Darabont's choice for the voice-over of the film, as if his character Red is talking to us, and explaining the sub-text of the film. Voice overs often dont work ( Blade Runner being a prime example ) but this one does, perfectly.
  
  Beginning at a slow pace, the film begins with the brutal de-humanising regime meted out to the 'Fresh Fish' as they begin their incarcaration in Shawshank. I remember suggesting my wife watch the film after I'd seen it, and she, being of a considerably more sensitive nature than me, found the early scenes difficult. If you too find the opening 45 minutes a tad heavy going, stick with it - the reward is worth it.
  
  Eventually as we progress through the film, we see how Red's initial suspicion of Andy becomes a deep respect, and eventually a deep friendship, indeed it would be true to say that these two men love each other like brothers by the end. There are a few key scenes that really stick in the memory - the rooftop scene, the opera aria scene, the exam result scene - all of which enable us to begin to like these men, men we probably wouldn't have wanted in our homes before the film, but who we'd happily sit down to dinner with after.
  
  The film's true emotional impact of course comes in the final third as we learn the truth about Andy's guilt or otherwise. True to many of King's works, there is a twist in the end which leaves us all stunned, and with a big stupid grin on our faces. The total and utter defeat of the dark forces in the film is accomplished with such applomb that you find yourself rooting for the bad guys - the prisoners, a bunch of murderers and misfits that two hours earlier you were deeply suspicious of. Indeed the last section of the film plays almost totally without our hero, and remains almost my favourite portion of it. By this time we are crying out for the final fulfilment of our hopes for the characters. It is to Frank Darabont's eternal credit that he accomplishes this in a scene without dialogue, and a sweeping panoramic withdrawl from the characters, leaving us with not a dry eye in the house, and a feel-good glow that lasts for days.
  
  ... while in [a local store] I noticed this man and wife trying to decide which DVD they would buy to view that evening. I pointed to Shawshank. "Ever seen this one?"
  "No"
  "Trust me" I said, "It's the best movie you've never seen." He bought it, and I like to think I made that man and wife cry, laugh and smile that evening.
  
  To conclude, Warner Bros and Castle Rock - SHAME ON YOU! This movie deserves better. The Region 2 version rocks, so get busy, re-package, and give us fans the extras this classic deserves!
  
  P.S. The ten-year anniversary edition has righted many wrongs. The film has finally been done justice. I watched it again the other night, and again my eyes welled up at the end. Either I am a wus, or I'm right, or maybe both! Yeah, both!
  
  
• Probably the only negative review
  By on 2002-07-21
  This is indeed a negative review of this movie.

  Most people will gasp at the fact that I didn't like this movie. I wasn't even aware that this film has been considered "the greatest film of all time" when I saw it. I was shocked to find this out.

  Shawshank Redemption is, by all accounts, a crowd-pleaser. It features appealing characters, a sentimental view of its subject (in this case, prison life), a sweeping score, and a tidy ending. This kind of film has "Best Picture" written all over it.

  But is it a good movie?

  The truth be told, it's not. Directed by Frank Darabont, the man who would later direct The Green Mile and the Majestic, this story about a man falsely sentenced to life in prison for murdering his wife is utterly devoid of ambiguity and emotional truth, or realism about prison. It is as idyllic and fitting-to-the-audience's-expectations as Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. American History X this is not.

  The story of Andy Dufreshne, the convited man, is a story worth telling. Steven King got it right in his short story-- "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption." In fact, I can't think of a more fitting example of how an adaptation fails to live up to the book's punch.

  Tim Robbins is excellent as Dufresne. And Morgan Freeman is astonishing as Red, Dufresne's prison buddy. But good acting cannot save a movie from a sentimental director.

  The movie is schmaltzy, makes black and white portrayals of good and evil, and it is frequently boring in its slow stretches.

  I "liked" this movie, but I can't swallow any of it. It didn't challenge me or my thinking. Minus the sentiment, the misteps in direction, or the vacancy of ambiguity, its lack of provoking thought is its fatal flaw.
  
  

• A thorough portrayal of hope and courage
  By on 1999-07-27
  When I had first seen The Shawshank Redemption, it was when I was about ten years old, and I hadn't really been exposed to some of the important issues that go on in life. When I saw this movie, it totally changed the way i go about my opinions, and my beliefs. The Shawshank Redemption is in my opinion, the greatest portrayal of how hope can never be destroyed. This movie goes far in depth of how mankind can develop in such a way that certain people, no matter the content of their character are judged by their personal rank in society. For example, the warden who is a terrible man is somehow put into the position where he has the power to decide how certain people will live their lives. In this story we also see a great display put on by Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman, that a great friendship can not be diminished by death, race, separation, or belief. Friendship is the key to living a happy life. You cannot be lonely and expect to be happy. As I end my little editorial, i want to share a quote, from this film.

  "Some birds aren't meant to be caged, their feathers are just too bright."

  This quote makes me think about how no matter how hard mankind tries, there will never be equality, in race, sex, power, and economy.
  
  

• No redeeming qualities and an unbelievable ending
  By on 2003-10-09
  I watched this movie after reading several reviews that rated it very highly. Not the usual prison film with violence, riots, etc., they said. Not true! Here is a movie that depicts and accepts severe bullying, both by the prisoners and the guards. The protagonist suffers biweekly beating and sodomy for the first two years; this is trivialized by the narrator as just "his routine". Perhaps we are to think that this is a movie about the protagonist rising above such humiliation, but the biweekly "routine" is stopped only by the guards bullying the bully, and the protagonist rises only by becoming a crook. The ending is such a surprise that we have to be shown some scenes cut from earlier in the story, while the narrator explains what we missed. But most unbelievable of all is the escape. The protagonist's cell is in the middle of a row, yet he somehow manages to tunnel through the wall not into the next cell but out to freedom! Give me a break!
  
  
• Absolute greatness
  By A3B90F5YX0SU0N on 2000-06-20
  The Shawshank Redemption is one of the best movies ever made. The acting is incredible, the characters are great, and the story is gripping. Tim Robbins, who plays the main character, Andy Dufresne, does an incredible job. He plays the heroic role of Andy to perfection, gaining the audience's sympathy and respect, while capturing their hearts with every step his character takes. While Robbins is great, though, Morgan Freeman is the one who steals the show in my eyes. His narration adds a lot to the movie, as does his overall portrayal of Ellis "Red" Redding. To think that he didn't win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor is truly mind-boggling. Together, Freeman and Robbins have incredible chemistry, and make for one of the best on-screen duos in recent memory.

  The story is a great one. Without giving anything away, I will only say that although this is a rather lengthy movie (bordering on 2 and a half hours), it is time well spent. There are highs and there are lows; there are offensive points, such as excessive swearing and sexual innuendos, but nothing in the movie is done without purpose. As Freeman's character puts it during the movie, "prison is no fairy tale." When you watch this one to the end, you'll have an appreciation for the realism that was presented within the film.

  This movie isn't just for those who enjoy prison movies; almost everyone who sees this movie will have an appreciation for it on some level. The Shawshank Redemption is a great one, folks; the fact that it didn't win Best Picture at the Oscars is truly a shame. If you have managed to avoid watching this one so far, don't put it off for another day. Rent it immediately, give it a watch, and I think that you'll find it difficult to resist buying it.

  I would also recommend buying the DVD of this movie if you have a player to accomodate it. It is admittedly short on features, but the picture is incredibly crisp and clear, and the sound comes through brilliantly. Don't shy away from buying this one unless excessive features are a must for you.
  
  

• Nice, but over-rated.
  By on 1999-12-07
  VERY long, well made TV movie of the week kind-a-film. There's a whole lot to recommend this film, it's well acted, well shot, and the basic story is fine. Problem is, it cannot escape being just another prison-film. It uses EVERY cliche' in the book.
  
  
• The Shawshank Redemption is very overrated!!!
  By A285Y6MRU4GH9 on 2000-09-08
  It's alright to watch ONCE. It's very well done, but painful to sit through this long movie twice. All you do is wait until he tries to escape; the only exciting part of the movie. The narration by Morgan Freeman is just plain goofy. When it starts, 'The first time I laid eyes on him (Tim Robbins)..." I thought, who cares what he is thinking. Also when Tim gets the free beer for some inmates, what's with him just sitting there with that, that smile? Have a beer you idiot, or join the conversation, or relax, don't just sit there staring with that smile. And finally (DON'T READ THIS if you haven't seen it yet) what kind of ending is it where two dudes are together on a beach. Really sounds like fun to me. And what would they talk about? 'Man jail really sucked... Yep, it sure did.' On the positive side the classical music scene was excellent. There's definitely much worse movies, but please don't buy this one. Too many people I know already own it, and it's not worth watching again.
  
  
• One of the Best Ever
  By A2BW9U1CSLIHJX on 2002-04-04
  Any time I ask someone what their favorite movie is, Shawshank Redemption always comes up in their top five. This movie is nothing short of brilliant. Every single role is perfectly portrayed by each actor, from the leads, with Morgan Freeman and Tim Robbins, all the way down to the smallest supporting roles. This is NOT your simple everyday prison drama. It reaches for greater heights of filmaking and even larger themes, such as patience(a theme rarely touched upon in cinema), hope, perseverence, sacrifice, true friendship, and resolve(get busy living or get busy dying). That's a long list and there's probably more. Anyway, the basic jist of the story is an accountant(Tim Robbins) gets thrown in prison for murdering his wife and her lover(we don't know whether or not he did it, the camera cuts away as we see him loading his gun). When he gets to prison, people start realizing that there is something different about him. The danger and reality of his situation doesn't seem to affect him, it's as if he is separated from his surroundings and has his own island of calm and steady resolve. Interestingly, the film is narrated by a long time inmate(Morgan Freeman) who soon befriends Robbins. This subtle touch helps add to the mystique of Robbins' character because we never really know who he is, or how he finds the quiet strength and hope deep down inside to keep him mentally apart from the horrifying prison life. The story spans about 20-30 years, and we are submitted to a variety of plot turns, colorful characters, and most of all, the inescapable duration of time. This film teaches not only the characters but the audience about patience. It is long, but it has to be. It shows us that every painful and seemingly hopeless turn of events only makes the moments of love and bonding sweeter, truly proving that we have to learn pain before we can appreciate pleasure. The movie is filmed with that in mind: lowpoints and pitfalls followed by small, temporary redemptions. But on the grand scale, it is all simply setting the scene for one of the greatest endings EVER put on film. I won't even give a hint as to what happens, but the last twenty minutes of this film are so good, you'll simply sit there in awe as the credits roll. It is truly that good. Keep in mind that the ending would never be as sweet had so much pain not been endured before hand. But oh that last shot, I'll probably never forget it, and neither will you. Buy this movie now. (NOTE: In terms of DVD extras, I think this is pretty thin, basically just the movie...so if you've got it on VHS, you might want to wait for the special edition. But if you don't have this movie, what are you waiting for? Order it as soon as possible.)
  
  
• The most incredible story ever filmed!
  By A1RBHMMBLODH9R on 2005-07-16
  The box office was cruel to this film. Whether it was the lack of a catchy title, or the rather bland movie poster showing Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman, the true spirit of this film never got the attention it deserved at it's big-screen opening. For this, I'm guilty, too. I showed no interest in it when it opened. Never have I been so wrong in judging a movie. The motion picture awards institutions were wrong in not properly recognizing this film as possibly the greatest of all time. I never expected a prison film to be my all-time favorite.
  
  It was two precious years before my brother convinced me to see it. I must say, no film has ever driven me to tears like this one did. It is a compelling story of the strength of human character, emerging from the most hopeless of situations. As it turns out, hope is exactly what empowers the prisoners of Shawshank.
  
  The cinematography and musical score are magical, especially in the scene where Red is dropped off in Buxton to search the fields for Andy's stash, and where he finally reunites with Andy in Mexico. It just streams with emotion. The script: superbly written. All this was put together by a talented director who can go to his grave knowing he orchestrated one of the finest films in history. Of course, Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton, William Sadler, Clancy Brown and other supporting cast members deserve much credit for the emotion they put into their respective characters.
  
  If you are one of the unfortunate people who haven't seen this film, you're missing out, big time. I envy those who are watching it for the first time. It is so completely engrossing a story, never boring, with a truely satisfying ending. It exudes hope. It defines redemption.
  
  

• Forrest Gump (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)
• The Green Mile (Two-Disc Special Edition)
• Good Will Hunting (Miramax Collector's Series)
• Schindler's List (Widescreen Edition)
• The Dark Knight (Full-Screen Single-Disc Edition)