Bose® QuietComfort® 2 Acoustic Noise Cancelling® Headphones Reviews

• Better stuff out there for $300

  
  By A33FS5H3CPDR6D on 2005-08-21
  with regards to sound, this is a very good headset
  
  The noise cancelling features are very good ---- unfortunately, the 'phones suffer from discomfort and price
  
  I compared these headphones, head to head, on an airplane, against the Sony MDR NC20, and there was no difference in sound - both performed excellently, and equally, within the airplane environment ---- however, the Sony ones were more comfortable and MUCH cheaper
  
  Don't even waster your time with the Bose Quite Comfort ---- grab a pair of the Sony's and you'll fall in love!
  
  

• Stay away from these headsets at all cost!

  
  By A2MZZP3ZU9B5JS on 2005-11-18
  A few years back I became a huge
  advocate for the Bose QuietComfort
  headphones that have been selling for $299.
  
  Based on my original experience with these
  headphones I posted a rather lengthy, positive
  review concerning their quality in both sound
  and workmanship.
  
  I'd now like to take those words back.
  
  It seems there is a defect in materials used
  in these headphones that could plague other
  owners in the years to come.
  
  3-4 years after purchasing my QuiteComfort
  headphones I noticed that the rubber earpiece
  material is flaking away like mad.
  
  Every time I wear the headset and take it
  off, my face and ears are covered with black
  residue from the shedding of the earpiece.
  My face looks like it is covered with black ants.
  
  Though these headsets are nearly 4 years old,
  I haven't worn them much outside of travel.
  Additionally, they have been kept in the
  travel accessory bag included in the package.
  
  What bothers me most about this is the fact
  that despite countless mails I have sent to
  Customer Service, Bose will not address this
  problem.
  
  While I understand the headsets are probably
  out of warranty, this is a pretty major defect
  in materials that most owners probably will not
  realize until after the warranty expires.
  
  As far as Bose is concerned, once your warranty
  is up with them they could be concerned less with
  what happens with their headsets.
  
  For the price that Bose charges for these headsets,
  I would expect this company to at least reply
  to consumers who are reporting this problem and
  offer suggestions on what can be done.
  
  Many users across the Internet have warned members
  about quality issues concerning Bose. I should have
  stayed away from these headsets based on those
  recommendations, but for some reason, the
  QuietComfort still remains at the top of most
  reviews dealing with noise-cancelling headsets.
  
  All I can do at this point is warn people
  to stay away from purchasing these headsets until
  Bose shows that they have some sort of concern
  towards complaints when their products go bad.
  
  My apologies for recommending these headsets
  to anyone that may experience the same problems
  I am experiencing now or in the near future.
  
  

• Excellent sound as expected from Bose.. bulky

  
  By AB9TBYP8HWEHJ on 2005-08-12
  I have owned a pai of the Quietcomfort headphones for more than a year now. They are absolutely great on intercontinental flights.
  
  Pros:
  - The sound is fabulous, bass reproduction is great.
  - Needs one AAA battery, but it goes for between 24 - 30 hrs of use so this is great.
  - Noise cancellation works great, great cushioning.
  
  Cons:
  - Pricey
  - bulky to transport, cant be substituted for "workout" phones.
  - Too much insulation on the earpiece. My ears start to sweat if i wear constantly for more than a couple of hrs.
  - Not great to sleep in (on flights) as you tend to block the noise cancellation ports.
  
  

• Don't make the "Bosetake"

  
  By A3AEQVHYRTKETU on 2005-12-05
  I have done some extensive research on Bose product, including this headphone, it is a ok headphone, not much better than what you can pick up at local Target for under $30.
  
  Let's start by the original "tri-port" headphone, what is triport? you might ask, after opening the can up, it was a paper driver with three holes in it, does it make the sound better? we don't know, does it make it worse, we don't know, maybe the same??? this lead me to doing some research on the specifications on this headphone: this is exactly quoted on Bose's website:
  Overall headphone dimensions: 7 3/4"H x 6 1/2"W
  
  Ear cushion outside dimensions: 3 4/5"H x 3"W
  
  Weight with cables: 6.9 oz.
  
  Let's not talk about the best cans money can buy (Grado etc.http://www.goodcans.com/), but aren't you curious what you are buying for 300 of them big boys? things such as the range and clarity of sound?
  
  So for comparison, how about something simular? (in price, not performance) A German designed and engineered Sennheiser offer far greater performance at a lower price. if you talk to any (i really mean ANY) audiophiles, he will tell you that he would not even consider Bose as a high end headphone. this is what Senn HD600 says about their product which is $30 cheaper than Bose.
  --------------------------------------------------------------
  Technical Data
  Nominal impedance 300 Ohm
  Contact pressure ca. 2,5 N
  Weight w/o cable 260 g
  Jack plug 3,5/6,3 mm stereo
  Transducer principle open, dynamic
  Ear coupling circumaural
  Cable length 3 m
  Frequency response (headphones) 12.....39000 Hz
  Sound pressure level (SPL) 97 dB(SPL)
  THD, total harmonic distortion 0,1 %
  Frequency response
  (graph can not be displayed)
  -----------------------------------------------------------------
  If anyone has a technical specification of Bose headphones, or any Bose products, please pose it or leave a review so we can all see them. I have tried numerous of Bose products, but none of them you can find any technical specifications. Or you can do a little self test; try any product on audio companies' product websites: either Klipsch or Sennheiser, and check out their product's specification. Some may say: how come we never even heard of the other brands if they are so good? The answer is simple, when you own a company that produces top products, you rather spend your limited assets on R&D and make your products better and word of mouth will spread out faster than speeding arrow. I was introduced to Sennheiser and I can personally recommend those to you and you won't be disappointed. Bose spend millions of dollar in advertising, that's why it is so well known and you even can see them in USA weekly included in your Sunday paper. Just think about it, every place we see the Bose ad is every dollar that will be incurred and added to the cost of the product. Essentially, we are paying for seeing the ads?!?! Do a little research, you can find some Bose replacement part (none Bose branded) but with the same specs for about 20-30 dollar. This headphone, with no exception will cost about 30-40 dollar to make. Now they are throwing in some CD player that's probably mass made in a third world country and you will never use since CD is getting out of style (ipod? wink ;) ), it cost about 30-50 dollar in general for a CD player, even good SONY or Panasonic ones. Did Bose say anything about their CD player or anywhere you can buy them and compare? We have all fall victim of mass marketing and you will not get a good product at the end.
  
  Check out this website for a comprehensive review for Bose products, I know it's not for the headphone, it might just give a new fresh idea for what to purchase in the future or in this case, what not to purchase.
  
  http://intellexual.net/bose.html
  
  Quotation from that website:
  Few magazines are now willing to give honest reviews of Bose products due to a Consumer Reports review a few years back that gave a bose product embarrassingly bad ratings (score of 62 out of 100). Consumer Reports allegedly used a double-blind comparison test, which is in fact the ideal way to compare speakers. That particular review ended up in a lawsuit over "unscientific testing methods". Thankfully, Bose lost that lawsuit, but since then, Consumer Reports and various other magazines give neutral-to-rave reviews that tip-toe around the actual sound quality and focus more on ergonomics and style. More prestigious publications like Fi and What HiFi? ignore Bose products completely.
  
  I am writing this review neither in hope that you will change your attitude toward Bose nor your decision to purchase this product, it's just interesting for me to discover a lot of less known about Bose and I would like to share them with you. You have the choice to get what's right for you.
  
  Peace
  
  
  

• Great for Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

  
  By A3C5NU6LVDU020 on 2006-06-10
  First, I am going to discuss the options for noise canceling headphones. Then, I am going to go into detail about the Bose QC2 headphones.
  
  If you are looking for a great pair of high-end traditional headphones that cup your ear, you are looking in the right place; the Bose QuietComfort 2s are for you! If you are an audiophile (probably not if you are considering buying something from Bose) then look at the Sennheiser HD 650s ($400). If you don't have a large budget and want reasonable noise-canceling, then look at the Sony MDR-NC6s ($35). If you like the supra-aural style of the Sony MDR-NC6s, but want a higher quality headphone, then wait for the Bose QuietComfort 3s ($349, release date June 15, 2006). If you are looking for noise canceling while operating landscaping equipment and OK audio performance, then look at John Deere's Noise Canceling Headset ($89). If you are looking for a really lightweight supra-aural noise canceling headset, then consider the Sennheiser PXC 300 ($150). Finally, if you want noise-caneling ear canal headphones, then the Etymotic Research ER6i's ($85) are for you.
  
  The QC2 comes in two flavors: champagne and silver (2005). The older champagne version has a problem with the headband breaking. If the headband breaks during your warranty period, Bose will send you a brand new pair of silver QC2s. The only other major difference between the two flavors is that the silver headphones work with Bose's cell-connect accessory. The cell-connect connects your compatible cellphone (there's a list on Bose.com) to the QC2s and has a mic. I personally don't know why one would need this accessory... but it's a neat add-on. I have used the cell-connect and QC2s with my Motorola E815 with no problems (other than the fact that I wasn't sure how loud to talk).
  
  The QC2s shine when worn on airplanes, trains, and public transit. They are also very good in the office to drown out the hums of air conditioning and computers. THEY do not make it completely quiet. High-frequency sounds such as people talking are NOT canceled out.
  
  I find the QC2s to be very comfortable. Make sure to test them out before you buy them, because the circumaural design is not for everyone. The headphones come with everything you need--1/4" and 3.5mm connectors, a great semi-hard shell case, and more. The strap for the case is not included with the silver headphones. The earcups on the headphones swivel to flatten and fit inside the case. An iPod can easily fit inside the case, and an iPod Nano can reportedly fit inside the small clear velcro case that initially holds "customer courtesy cards" (which are business cards that you can give to people that ask about your QC2s).
  
  Make sure to stock up on AAA batteries for the QC2s. The QC3s use a custom Bose rechargable lithium battery instead. Battery life is good, and a light will blink on the side of the headphones when your battery is low.
  
  Overall, I'm very satisfied with my QC2s, and I think other people are too. I even saw someone wearing them while driving! (Don't do that).
  
  
• Headsets Fall Apart
  By A1N3M1NGSM4UWM on 2005-11-18
  The sound was awesome - no question about it - but the headphones fell apart after 8 months. The cheap plastic used to connect the ear pieces to the head piece cracked and eventually broke, and now a sharp piece of metal sticks into my head if I ever wear them. I needed to tape them with hockey tape to hold them together.....I expect better for $300!
  
  [Look in the product images for pictures of where they broke]
  
  
• Pricey for the performance
  By A1Z2POSGCSKBMB on 2005-12-08
  I purchased both this item and the Sennheiser at the same time to see which was the better purchase. Both my wife and I tested them and independently (we did a blind vote so to speak) and both concluded the Sennheiser was equivalent noise reduction and sound quality - at half the price. We returned the bose and purchased three more Sennheiser's for ourselves and our boys.
  
  tom
  
  
• side-by-side comparison of Sony MDR-NC50 & Bose QuietComfort® 2
  By A19UKSNXNZX1I1 on 2006-01-31
  I was reading about noise canceling headphones because there is this loud noisy AC unit over my cube at work. Also, I am planning a trip to China.
  
  My buddy let me try his Bose QuietComfort® 2 head phones. The Bose did eliminate the noise. I was impressed, but the price of $299 was a little steep. Then I read all of the reviews on the Sony MDR-NC50 for $123 and decided to get a pair.
  
  In a quiet space, I first tried the Sony MDR-NC50s and then the Bose QuietComfort 2s.
  
  The Sony's are known for needing a high volume level. The Bose have a switch on the plug for low and high input. The Sony's do not. The Bose uses its internal circuitry to amplify the sound and they stop playing when you turn the noise cancellation off.
  
  The results are: I noticed immediately the Sony has a slight (annoying) hiss when I first switched on the noise cancellation with no music. I then tried on the Bose, and no hiss; they were full quieting.
  
  The noise cancellation of both the Sony and the Bose was essentially very close. The AC unit is pretty loud. Haven't tried either one on an airplane or commercial jet yet.
  
  In this comparison test, I then played a number of things such as classical, classic jazz and a little Pink Floyd. All CDs, no MP3s.
  
  Switching the Sony's on and off is when I discovered the loss of sound quality with the noise cancellation on. When I turned the noise cancellation off, the loss was restored.
  
  Starting at about 1 kHz, the frequency response was not flat. The MDR-NC50s seemed to have a noticeable round off in the higher frequencies. To very this, I put on the Bose and then the MDR-NC50s. There is definitely distortion in the upper frequency range. The MDR-NC50s are not that clear and vivid with the noise cancellation turned on. The Bose are much improved. But the bass was somewhat less. On the Sony's the bass was a little better.
  
  Also, both my Sony Walkman devices pay too softly through the Sony's. I have to turn up the volume all the way. With the Bose, there is plenty of volume.
  
  Well, the Bose are defiantly better, fidelity wise and noise wise. They have no disheartening loss of fidelity and absolutely no annoying background hiss. Also, they require much less volume.
  
  The things about the Sony's that are better are: the bass is better, they are less than half the cost of the Bose, they look like they are more durable, and the battery lasts a little longer.
  
  But, if you are an audiophile like me, the Bose are better. I am returning the Sony's and I ordered the Bose.
  
  
  
• Several times the cost of competing products. Then again it's not much of a competition.
  By A4IL0CLL27Q33 on 2006-05-11
  As a consultant I traveled 2-3 days per week. I spent a lot of time listening to one-sided cell phone conversations, inane chatter, jet engines, train noise and bad music in coffee shops and airport concourses. I purchased the Bose Quiet Comfort headphones right before I departed on a 5 day, 3 city trip.
  
  From the moment I put them on I knew this was a breakthrough product. Sure - I noticed something akin to pressure on my ears but that sensation passed in a few minutes. It's just like getting used to wearing a watch - you end up not noticing it at all after a short time. What has not passed is the joy in letting the rest of the world just fall away so that I can get some down time while traveling.
  
  Not only was the background noise from the plane's engines gone, but I could actually turn the volume down on my Creative Zen Vision much lower than would be the case with other headphones because the music wasn't competing with the roar of the engines.
  
  The same with the volumn while watching movies - I didn't have to crank up the volume just to hear what was being said. I could even hear the dialogue of movies played on my laptop and those played by the airline. I cannot emphasize this point enough - for the first time ever, I could actually hear music and videos without cranking up the volume to the max - saving my ears from damage as well as avoiding dirty looks from my fellow passengers.
  
  On my honeymoon, my wife and I both brought along a pair. Being able to distance ourselves from all the background noise really did increase the relaxation factor and allowed us to travel 12 hours each way in relative peace. Speaking of honeymoons - this item would be a GREAT wedding gift. There is nothing worse than to spend your time enroute to some fabulous tropical destination for your honeymoon listening to the kids behind you scream while their father snores away.
  
  Even at home, my wife will sometimes wear her headphones while reading. It completely eliminates any noise from the television in the next room.
  
  Contrary to what one other reviewer has stated, the sound from these headphones is anything but distorted. I find that I can hear subtleties in music that I cannot hear over my home entertainment system. The fact that I can still hear these subtleties while in a loud environment is an added bonus.
  
  You probably will not wear these headphones while in the gym (though I have actually seen people wearing them while on the treadmill at my local gym - the same type of people that wear designer workout shorts). There are also times where you don't need noise reduction. For these times, I have inexpensive headphones. I would not however deduct any points from Bose for making a specialty set of headphones just because they are not perfect for all situations. I would not take points off my favorite leather jacket because I can't wear it to the beach in July.
  
  Yes, these things are expensive. But if you feel the need to shield yourself from the pervasive noise of the modern world, there really is no substitute on the market.
  
  Update on 5/12/2006 - A friend of mine had an interesting observation when she tried these headphones. She's a violinist and said that she did not think the feelings in her ears was 'pressure'. Rather she commented that she thinks the feeling is actually the response of the ears to a lack of normal background noise. We spend all our time being bombarded by an array of sounds. When those sounds disappear, the ears are confused and express this as a feeling of pressure. That's only her theory but it makes some sense to me. I scuba dive a few times a year and I know what pressure in the ears feels like. The feeling I used to notice while wearing my bose headphones wasn't anything like that kind of pressure - either in feel or magnitude. It's interesting to note that the absence of sound may be able to cause a physical reaction.
  
  Update on 6/6/2006
  Just came home from vacation in Hawaii. On Kauai I took a helicopter tour. The company running the tours, Blue Hawaii, provided Bose noise cancelling headphones on the flight. Many of the other companies in Kauai did not offer noise cancelling headphones.
  
  A few minutes in to the flight I took the headphones off to see what the noise level would be like. It was close to deafening and I could not even hear myself speaking loudly. I put the headphones on and the noise became little more than an after thought. If you find yourself looking to take a helicopter tour at some point in the future, make sure you find a company that offers Bose on its tours.
  
  
• Much better build-quality than the previous QuietComfort 2's...
  By A1GOKUUDRB63FQ on 2005-10-13
  First, let me explain how I came to own this version of the QC2's. I bought a pair about two years ago. Within 6 - 8 months the casing where the metal extension band is joined to the earpiece section cracked and then disintegrated. I took them back to the Bose store, which replaced them with no questions asked. Six months later the second pair disentegrated at the same point; back to the Bose store where they gave me a third pair. By this time I no longer had my original receipt, but the store didn't argue, which suggested to me that this was a known design deficiency. Eight months later, same problem, even though I'd handled the third pair so gingerly I didn't think they could possibly disintegrate. I went back to the store once more, and they gave me my current pair, which represents a new version, even though they didn't rename them (a la QC 3's). According to the rep, Bose redesigned the joint and substituted a different plastic. You can clearly see the difference in the joint, and the plastic is a slightly different color. Also, the earpiece plastic, which was a gunmetal color in the original QC 2's, is now silver
  
  The sound of the previous generation, while not true audiophile quality, was very good, and the comfort and noise-canceling feature overcame any audio deficiencies. I have a home recording studio where I primarily use Sony MDR 7506's. Those have better audio fidelity than the Bose, but they aren't nearly as comfortable to wear for a prolonged period. I can wear the QC2's for hours without discomfort; the Sony's start to annoy me after 30 minutes.
  
  The store rep told me they slightly "improved" the audio characteristics in this modified version. The only audio difference I've really noticed though is that this version is significantly less loud than the earlier one. With the old version, I seldom maxed out the volume when using them with my iPod. With the new ones, I find that I max out the volume pretty regularly. Still, I look forward to these being sturdier and more reliable.
  
  A word about Bose customer service. I got no resistance during any of my three trips to the store to get the broken units replaced. I was in and out of the store in each case in less than 10 minutes with a replacement pair, and I didn't even have the original receipt on the 3rd and 4th visits. The store guys were profusely aplogetic each time, and when they gave me the latest set, they even issued me a new receipt so the one-year warranty would start anew. That means they've given me three years of warranty coverage, and four pairs of headphones. I'm amazed, given the abysmal state of customer service these days. Admittedly, at $300 a pair, the service should be outstanding, but I've been disappointed more than once by the "customer service" provided by companies that sell premium-priced products (so far, Apple Computer has been the worst example I've encountered - try getting them to fix or replace a defective product; bring your lawyer!)
  
  In conclusion, if you're thinking of getting these, be sure and get the newest generation. They're still called QC2's, but they're easily distinguished from their predecessor by the silver color on the headset (vs. the older gunmetal finish). Stay away from the old ones; they will eventually break no matter how gently you handle them. Also, if you can, buy directly from a Bose store. I've heard some horror stories here and elsewhere about owners dealing with Bose via phone and the web and running into the kind of experiences I've had with Apple. The stores are much more like Lexus dealerships; if you have a problem, they take care of it with no fuss (at least in my multiple experiences).
  
  
• Worth the wait
  By A29V754TP68LZL on 2006-06-10
  It's literally taken me months to decide which noise-cancelling headphones to purchase. I foolishly flirted with a relatively inexpensive in-ear version by Panasonic - total waste of money.
  By reading reviews and road-testing the various products (where possible), I narrowed my choices to Sennheiser PCX300 and Bose QC2. I decided on the Bose, and here's why:
  1. Unlike the PX300s, the QC2s have an unobtrusive mic battery setup, one AAA tucked neatly into the right earpiece.
  2. The Bose only have one lead, whereas the Senns have two. Less chance of getting them tangled.
  3. The QC2s cover the entire ear, thereby further preventing noise intrusion, and leakage. I also found this more comfortable than the Senns, which sort of *press up* against the ear.
  4. I found the bass response more pronounced with the Bose and, I think, a little louder overall.
  5. I also like the hard case that accompanies the headphones. I know it will fit neatly into the plane's luggage compartment on the back of the seat in front of me. There's room in it for the bits and pieces that come with the 'phones and also extra space for my vidpod, possibly an external battery pack.
  6. I already own Bose products and know that they are of the highest quality, especially when it comes to innovation in sound reproduction.
  That about sums it up. I've purchased the 'phones predominantly to use on domestic and international flights, but I'm slowly getting the feeling I'll be using them a little more often than that.
  I only bought the QC2s a few hours ago, and literally haven't been able to take them off my head - want to listen to my entire library anew. So they are pricey, but I'm thinking worth the extra.
  BTW: I rated the product 4 stars. If the headphones were able to be used sans the NC, I would have given it 5.
  
  POSTSCRIPT: I've had the headphones for approx a week now and have had the opportunity to use them on a Melbourne-Sydney return flight. I have some further comments I'd like to make.
  1) I used the QCs in the lounge before take-off, and I have to say I felt a bit awkward sitting or walking around with such *big* headphones on. It's probably something I'll get used to in time.
  2) In-flight, I felt my ears warm - not to the point of discomfort, but it was noticeable.
  3) On the positive side, I put the phones on as soon as I was seated, turned the NC on, and immediately felt calmer. I could still hear some discussion and announcements, but that general din (which you don't really notice until you have the means by which to cancel it) all but disappeared. I think this alone is a big plus.
  4) Listening to and watching my vidpod was an absolute pleasure. I found the sound level more than adequate, and on certain tracks had to actually dial the volume back slightly, especially when watching movies.
  So I guess the only thing I have to overcome is getting used to perhaps looking different with my *cans* on.
  
  
• Don't believe the hype
  By A31YOZ9RAF1G4O on 2005-08-18
  I just received these as a gift from my mom as she knows that I enjoy music and good music reproduction but unfortunately these headphones fail in that requirement and also noise reduction. Bose has enjoyed market adoption and success because they put a significant investment in the marketing of these headphones. On airplanes and in airports, I constantly see people with their QC2s on and often times I hear them expounding on the greatness of their Bose headphones, which unfortunately makes me want to roll my eyes and snicker at them for pushing a product that is too expensive for what it does. Granted the noise reduction works fairly well on airplanes but it doesn't provide enough isolation from ambient and environmental noises.
  
  A few years ago, I found Head-fi.org while searching for a new set of headphones and at that time was sucked into the Bose marketing machine. It came as somewhat of a shock to me when so many members of Head-fi criticized the QC2 of being a poor sounding headphone with respect to its sound. After trying many of the suggested headphones from that site, I slowly began to understand why the QC2 and Triports were inferior products that sold for much higher than their real value. There are so many other headphones out there from manufacturers such as Etymotic and Shure, which do a much better job of accurate sound reproduction and isolation from ambient noises. In back to back comparisons between my new QC2 and my Shure E4, I was severly disappointed with the poor sound reproduction in the QC2 and it's inability to isolate me from all outside noises other than just low frequency noises that the QC2 block. The Shure E4 and Etymotic ER4P do a much better job in that respect as they are canal phones and block all outside noises. Once the music or movie is playing, all outside noises are difficult to hear.
  
  If you're searching for a good set of headphones for traveling and for blocking ambient noises, do yourself a favor and avoid the QC2. You'll not only save yourself a lot of money but you'll also get better sound reproduction and better isolation. Unfortunately my mom didn't know that and bought the QC2 as a gift for me. They'll be sold soon and I'll keep on using my Shure and Etymotic headphones.
  
  
• Sounds great, except around cellphones
  By A1Q4MNIUESQTBM on 2005-09-19
  These headphones sound awesome. As long as you do not use them near: certain cellphones, wireless phones, or anything that is wireless. Some of these devices create unwanted sounds such as screeching, oscillating low beeps and other unwanted sounds. I was so disappointed when I received my official "blowoff" letter from bose with no resolution of the problem. But I have to admit, the sound quality (when not beeping) was unbelievable.
  I have noticed that some reviewers have commented on the bad noise cancelling ability, That is because the headphones have 2 settings, low and high levels of cancelling and by default they ship in the low setting. switch it to high and you won't hear much except your music. unless your near a cellphone, then you will hear beep-screeeeech-beep
  
  
• Quite Overrated
  By A5KLJBLTMDYRT on 2006-03-20
  Noise cancellation technology is still fairly fledgling in its engineering, and these headphones, despite how much Bose markets their research as authoritative, still exhibits these flaws.
  
  1) The headphones tend to put an anti-sound pressure on your ears in order to cancel out noise. Given these are closed headphones, this can become uncomfortable over time, both pressing and insulating your ears from the outside environment.
  
  2) Noise cancellation causes a hiss, effectively raising the noise floor of the signal (i.e. music being played in the system), reducing the ability to hear details and music quality.
  
  3) These headphones, as far as headphones go, simply sound bad. They present an extremely unnatural bass and rolled off treble. The bass is simultaneously booming and somehow fails to convey any sense of the original bass track in the music. The advantage to this is that almost regardless of what you listen to, the quality of the music will be obscured. When listening to poorly encoded tracks, these headphones will present an unoffensive, unobtrusive, never overly harsh sound. That said, many headphones manage to obscure even more detail than these do.
  
  I can understand the use for these headphones if one really hates better isolating canalphones and must frequently travel by plane or in noisy, rumbly environments. Still, similar quality can be had for less in other products like those sold from Sennheiser, Shure, or Etymotic.
  
  
• Good noise cancelling - shoddy workmanship
  By A2KF3H5304I4IA on 2005-12-04
  I am the owner of a now worthless original version of this headset. It was great while it lasted.
  
  Like others, mine were well taken care of and used only when traveling. After about two years they developed an annoying buzz and rattle. As they were out of warranty I did try tightening the two screw that hold the electronics in the headpiece. This had no effect.
  
  Over time the buzzing grew worse to the point where they were way more annoying than any outside noise.
  
  For the price of these units, they should have a LIFETIME warranty against any problems related to workmanship. Sure, if you smash them that should be on you but a well cared for set of this price should be an investment you only make once.
  
  I might have actually upgraded to the newer versions were it not for the quality issues. Based on posts here, these issues clearly have not been addressed.
  
  
  
• If best noise cancellation is what you want, there is currently (almost) no way around the Bose
  By A2CDALGO2ZPI1O on 2006-01-15
  Abstract: if you desire near optimal noise cancellation and comfort, safe the money you may spend experimenting with cheaper substitutes-you may still end up purchasing the Bose' anyway.
  
  Having to travel a lot by plane the promise of noise cancelling headphones seemed blessing. With that promise in mind, and being deterred by the hefty prise of the Bose (as well as the disappointing quality of the cheaper 'active' noise cancelling alternatives available). I first tried 'passive' noise cancellation. Following favorable reviews, I stuck with the Sennheiser HD-280, which I got for $79 instead of the $299 for the Bose QC2. Why do you read this in a review about the Bose QC2?
  
  To make it short, I just bought the Bose (outrageous price or not)-and that even though I still think in the Sennheisers are better in terms of pure audiophile quality. However, if the best noise cancellation is what you have in mind, there is currently no way around the Bose.
  
  Noise cancellation is never perfect, but the Bose come close. A big bonus with them is that they feel so increadibly light and soft that you will hardly notice them.
  
  So what are the downsides? First: being 'active' they are supplied by battery power. Consequence being that the actual noise cancellation can actually weaken as the batteries are drained. Something like an indicator light that comes on before this happens (so you know when it's time to replace the batteries) would be an obvious solution.
  
  Second downside: the sound. If audiophile sound reproduction is an issue, you will be somewhat disapointed. The sound is quite 'muddy' and 'bassey', as if somebody simultaneously switched on 'treble reducer' and 'loudness',which can result in some poor definition sound scaping.
  
  P.S. If your primary concern is sound quality, and the actual degree of noise cancellation plus comfort only your second, then consider the alternatives. The much cheaper Sennheiser HD-280, for instance, are better in the first regard. Their passive noise cancellation (which simply works by actually clamping and sealing the headsets over your ears) works astonishingly well. However, if you have a chance, try them out first (as well as other headsets working according to the same principle)! As much as I like their sound, I still invariably get a headache after a while with them on.
  
  
• Very poor quality and durability
  By A2XEFO78RY6OP on 2005-10-18
  I have owned a number (I think a total of SIX units) of Bose TriPort AND QuietComfort2 headsets. They work as advertised, and do eliminate some background noise. The QuietComfort2 has a low hissing sound when used. Overfall audio quality is superb..
  However the plastic used in manufacturing is not durable. The headsets repeatedly break. Using the TriPort, I had to exchange the headsets (under warranty) five or six times. Finally I told Bose I did not want to have any more replacement TriPort units.... they offered a "deal" at $99 for upgrading to the QuietComfort2 headset.
  Ten months later I discover the QuietComfort2 alslo has weak plastic parts and break apart in essentially the same location.
  Although Bose has backed up their product with replacements, it is irritating to have a product constantly falling apart, and then have to ship back the old unit and wait for a replacement (about ten days).
  I was surprised when the headsets starting breaking. Bose is a quality product (I also have their home theater speaker system). Perhaps the Chinese plastic manufacturing has some quality control problems. (Yeah another point--- made in China and still priced at $299.00???? Does not compute!)
  
  
  
• Bose is the best noise cancelling on airplane
  By A1HRGDLAWYS1DK on 2006-06-06
  I travel once to twice every month and I want to buy a pair of good noise-cancelling headphones so that I can listen to my iPod or get some rest.
  
  First, I tried a Sony NC50 at a Sony Style store. The NC50 put out so much accoustic pressure to my ears and it really hurt. Then, I tried Sennheiser PXC-250, PXC-300, and Bose QuietComfort 2 extensively. First time, I brought both PXC-250 and PXC-300 to a trip from San Diego to Newark. There is no significant performance difference in terms of noise cancelling. The PXC-300 has a better case. Then, on my next trip, I borrowed a Bose QuietComfort 2 from a colleague of mine and compared it with PXC-300. After extensively testing (with and without music, with and without background people talking, and etc.), I found it is about 20-30% less of noise with Bose. Also, my ears felt warm and uncomfortable after 30 min with PXC-300 because of the over-the-ear style.
  
  I understand everyone else's comment on Bose being over-priced, but if you are looking for the best noise-cancelling performance on an airplane, unfortunately there is no other way around it. Bose is certainly the best.
  
  
• Bose customer for life...
  By A28K46ZZPM9Z6O on 2006-01-13
  I won't comment on the sound or isolation quality of these, go to a brookstone or apple store and judge that for your self before spending this much. I give them a solid 5 stars for this my self.
  
  What I do have that is worth mentioning here is that the other day a complete moron saw me using them and decided to test whether I could hear him popping bubble wrap less than an inch from the right ear cup. Now, if you've never had this done to you without any hearing protection it can be very damaging to your ear drum. So, what happened to the ear phones is the sound cancelling components on that side were apparently blown. Now when I move my head or touch that side the sound and isolation cuts out.
  
  I was sick because my warantee ran out a few weeks back. I emailed bose anyway and a day later they've offered to replace my set free of charge along with a new warantee. Try that with any other company and see how you fare. Three hundred dollars well spent. I give customer service 5 stars as well but in my mind now they're well beyond that outstanding rating.
  
  
• Does Exactly What it is Supposed to Do
  By AGQIQ1TEW7H5R on 2006-03-04
  We found these headphones excellent for:
  
  Airplanes/trains: Significantly cuts engine noise and sound allowing movies/audio to be played at a low volume with clear and crisp sound.
  
  Also, with headphone power on but sound cord disconnected...a good way to cut ambient plane/train noise when sleeping. Much more comfortable and more effective than traditional earplugs.
  
  Gym (health club): Great for treadmill/bicycle TV connection. Cuts out almost all treadmill and other noise while providing good TV sound.
  
  Also, with power on but sound cord disconnected...great for the gym exercise machine area. Significantly eliminates the generic, pounding gym music that the children who handle the reception desk at my local Equinox feel compelled to blast.
  
  The Bose headphones are light, do not feel hot and are comfortable to wear. One AAA battery lasts more than 20 hrs with a long "going dead" visual warning.
  
  BUT NOTE: You WILL hear conversation and other sounds wearing the Bose headphones. They cut out steady "low frequency" noise. They are NOT, nor are they meant to be, industrial strength sound blockers designed to eliminate 30+ db of outside sound or protect your eardrums against firearm sounds. If that is what you want, you can find it starting at less than $30/pair. Do a search for "ear muffs".
  
  Nor are they meant to provide the highest quality sound, even if attached to a state of the art stereo system. If that is your goal, there are also better, less expensive alternatives.
  
  Basically, they provide very good noise reduction where it is needed along with more than acceptable sound reproduction.
  
  Bose is a responsible company. The headband part of our early model broke and they replaced it with a stronger update...took about 2 weeks. Our only cost was our one way shipping.
  
  Finally..yes, these headphones are fiendishly expensive and very likely extremely profitable to Bose (but their advertising budget is clearly huge). Each potential buyer needs to decide if they will be used enough to warrant the cost.
  
  
  
  
• Great Design But Comfort Problems.
  By A3LSLLR3OAJI7Y on 2006-12-01
  Let me start by saying that Bose noise reduction headphones save lives. There are several babies (and their inept parents) who are alive today because my first generation Bose noise reduction headphones muted their screaming just enough on long flights to keep me from having to kill them.
  
  But my old ones recently disintegrated on a flight to Singapore, so I had to look for replacements. I did extensive Internet research to compare the other brands that have come out in recent years. I also tried a set by Sony that a friend had. The overwhelming consensus seemed to be that the Bose models, which the most expensive, were the best of the lot.
  
  So I ordered the QuietComfort 2. I primarily use them for noise reduction on flights and in my office, so I wasn't looking for audiophile level sound reproduction. I found them perfectly acceptable on that count. I wouldn't recommend them for someone who was primarily interested in the audio quality, but it was certainly good enough for casual use.
  
  I found the noise reduction excellent--on a par with or perhaps a bit better than my first generation ones. As other reviewers have noted, they do not (and are not intended to) quell all sound, but are most effective at the background roar of an airplane or ventilation system. They don't actually cut out baby screams, but do reduce them to the survival level.
  
  The new design was exception. The big flaws with the first generation ones were that the noise reduction mechanism was external, meaning that there was a box and cord that always dangled. That was really a pain when getting out of my seat on an airplane. In the new ones, the cord is removable so you can do without it when you're using them strictly for noise reduction.
  
  The new models also fold flat which makes them easier to carry. And they come with a very nice hard case which should prevent tearing them up by pulling them out of a briefcase as I did with my old ones.
  
  Overall, the QC 2 was smaller and lighter than my first generation set.
  
  But now the bad news. I found them so uncomfortable that I returned them to exchange for QC 3s. The ear compartment was so small that it crumpled my ear, and the pressure on the temple of my eyeglasses caused discomfort after a short time. There was a pair of QC 3s in my office so I was able to spend a day switching back and forth. I found the noise reduction slightly better with the QC 2s, but the QC3s were significantly more comfortable. I couldn't imagine wearing the QC 2s on a long flight to Asia or Africa, but could the QC 3s. The QC 3s are also slightly smaller and have a rechargeable battery (which may or may not be an advantage). They do cost $50 more.
  
  Bose, of course, has a thirty day, no questions asked return or exchange policy. Given all the pluses of the QC 2s, I can recommend that people try them. It may be that the discomfort issue is particular to my funky head. But if they do cause problems, swapping for QC 3s is an excellent option.
  ***********************
  A year after swapping the QC2 for QC3s, I must add a caveat: they create so much pressure on my ears that I cannot use them. I don't blame Bose for this, but my ears. Word to the wise: if you get them, be sure you give them an extended wear before the return period expires.
  
  
  
• Great headphones, not so great price
  By A2UKPNO8K0V0IL on 2005-12-22
  3 stars?! Oh, please people...these deserve at least 4.5! Noise canceling is great and the sound is just beyond this world. I've discovered some new sounds and background vocals in my favorite mp3s while having these on. Yes, they are pricey and probably worth about $200 instead of $300, but hey, for this kind of sound I gladly paid the premium price.
  To other reviewers: I don't know where you got this idea that $30 Target headphones are the same quality or even better. If you're frustrated about the price then don't get them.
  
  The only downside of these headphones is the pressure they create. I sometimes get a little nauseous after wearing them...but I'm very sensitive to such things, so I don't believe that's common.
  
  
  
  
• Best of any external Noise Cancelling that I have tried.
  By AFT1TZL2G2ZX7 on 2006-02-14
  I have tried many different noise cancelling headphones. I've tried the Sony NC20 and NC6, some from JVC, from Altec Lansing and Sennheiser. They do a superior job of noise cancelling. With the others, which reduce the ambient noise, you can actually HEAR the noise cancelling, and depending on the model, it may be as loud as the ambient noise you are trying to cancel. With the Bose, all you hear is quite.
  
  Now, you have to realize how active-type noise cancelling works, and what kind of noises it will cancel. The technology works by sampling the ambient noise, and producing the exact inverse of the noise. The result (or at least the desired result) is that the inverse cancels out the ambient, and your ears hear nothing. The headphones can not cancel out the noise the first time it occurs. You will realize this when you are wearing them, and then turn them on. They also can not cancel out any noise that is not droning. They will cancel out noises such as static, engine noise, and building air conditioning. They will not cancel out music, or human voices, or other sounds that are not droning sounds. They also have a limit to the DB level of cancellation. If you walk into a room with a generator running, do not expect them to silence the noise completely, but only to reduce the level.
  
  The best way to cancel all noise is to insert ear plugs. You can purchase headphones such as the Shure or Etymotic Research ones to add music. These do not use active noise cancelling, but isolate you from noise. The upside is that they isolate you from everything below a certain DB level. The down side is that they insert in your ear, which many will find uncomfortable for a long duration. They are also as expensive as the Bose.
  
  For long trips, or cancelling out the noisy work environment's air handlers, or such, the Bose are the best in technology and comfort. Having spent more than the Bose cost trying all the cheaper headphones, I wish I had just went for the QC2 fron the beginning. It would have saved me a lot of money and time.
  
  
• Bose Quiet Comfort 2 vs Sennheiser 250-NO CONTEST
  By A3JZ7ZC39PM2KH on 2006-07-23
  I purchased the Sennheiser 250's about two months ago after reading many glowing reviews by users.
  
  Frankly, I do not understand how anyone can even begin to compare these with the Bose Quiet Comfort 2's.
  
  The Sennheisers reproduce practically no bass whatsoever and the treble is exceedingly and unnaturally bright. The sound is basically like the 200's with added noise cancelling.
  
  Anyway, after taking two flights with the Sennheisers, I decided to spring for the Bose. They are superb! Noise cancellation is excellent, comfort is top notch, and the sound rivals any headset that I have tried...and I HAVE tried the Grados, etc. The Grados sound great for about 20 minutes. After that time, the sound is overridden by the pain on my ears, due to the tight fit of the Grado's.
  
  One must,however, treat the Bose with kid gloves. I imagine that part of this is due to the fact that Bose wants to keep them lightweight and comfortable. But then, would you wear your Rolex, while fixing the plumbing in your home?
  
  As a musician, I can assure you that you will not find a better pair of headphones than the Bose. I understand that the price is rather high; but when there is no real competition out there for excellent noise cancelling phones, a manufacturer can charge all that traffic will bear.
  
  
  
• great sound, shoddy engineering, great customer support
  By AG4WOFVIM2H4P on 2005-11-29
  I have owned the Bose QuietComfort2 (BQC2) for about 2 years now. It is an ear-saver on long flights. The sound is excellent. However, the engineering on these headphones could be improved. The black plastic that holds the earphones together is very flimsily engineered and prone to cracking. Minor cracks appeared in the BQC2 left and right stems within weeks after the purchase. A year or 10 months into a new BQC2, I absentmindedly attempted to take the headphone off by pulling on the right headphone. Big mistake. The plastic on the stem broke and the right headphone got totally detached from the rest of the BQC2; it was hanging on just by a thread, which is the power supply/signal wire to the electronics in the headphone. I gamely put the thing back by wrapping a scotch tape around the top of the plastic sleeve where the metal stem holding the left or right headphone goes in and out to adjust for head size. Not pretty, but it worked. But now the plastic would develop additional crack in the middle of the left and right stems. Totally fed up, I decided to bring the damaged BQC2 to the Galleria Tysons Corner, VA store where I bought it, looking for "friendly discussions" with the staff there, and a replacement or refund. Surprise. The tech guy at the store just took one look at my "bandaged" BQC2, opened a new BQC2 box, and handed me the new one in there. No questions were asked. Didn't even look at my receipt. Now that is impressive customer support!
  
  So, would I recommend the BQC2? It depends. If you are kind of heavy handed at times, like me, may be there are better choices. If you are extra careful with your toys, it will probably work. In either case, Amar Bose will stand by his product so there won't be any regrets.
  
  
  
  
  
• Comparison of Sony MDRNC11A vs Bose QC2 vs Brookstone Soundshield 501
  By A3IL3D39T1Z0XU on 2007-01-08
  My primary purpose for noise canceling headphones is to cancel airplane noise. I fly over 50k miles/year and find noise canceling to be effective at reducing jet lag. Noise canceling headphones have the added benefit of allowing much better reproduction of on-board movie and mp-3 player audio at a much lower volume requirement.
  
  I have owned and will compare Sony MDRNC10, Sony MDRNC11A vs Bose QC2 vs Brookstone Soundshield 501.
  
  I will compare the 3 headphones still available based upon my 3 major criteria in order of priority:
  1) Noise Canceling Effectiveness
  2) Comfort
  3) Audio Quality
  
  By far, the most important criteria to me is noise canceling effectiveness on an airplane. Price is not a factor for this purchase due to the value of the product to me.
  
  The first NC headphones I owned were the discontinued Sony MDRNC10's. These were VERY effective at noise canceling, they however would not stay in my ears (small canals) for very long. I was constantly having to screw them back deep into my skull during the flight. They also would become uncomfortable during long flights. When I lost them in 2003, I decided to purchase the much hyped Bose QC2's. I decided to switch in order to avoid the poor fit/comfort of the in canal type.
  
  Bose QC2's:
  1) Noise Canceling: Worst
  2) Comfort: Best
  3) Audio Quality: Worst
  
  I owned and used the Bose for 3 years during well over 100 flights.
  
  Noise Canceling: Noise canceling was not near as effective as the Sony MDR-NC11A's, or the Brookstone Soundshield 501s. I would estimate about 50% of noise was cancelled.
  
  Comfort: Very comfortable to wear. Lightweight, no sweating.
  
  Audio Quality: Acceptable, but not as good as the Sony or Brookstone's.
  
  
  Brookstone Soundshield 501
  1) Noise Canceling: Middle
  2) Comfort: Worst
  3) Audio Quality: Best
  
  After also losing my Bose QC2's, I decided to look for something better. My first inclination was to go back to the Sony's. Especially since they now offer 3 sizes of earpieces to help acheive proper fit (my only problem with the original NC10's). The Sony's cannot be returned due to in-ear design, and the Brookstone's seemed impressive in the store. So, I decided to first try the Soundshield 501's. I owned them for 3 weeks and 5 flights before returning them.
  
  Noise Canceling: Very effective. Significantly better than Bose. Not as good as Sony.
  
  Comfort: Not very comfortable. Both the headband and earcups produced discomfort. Least comfortable of any model tested.
  
  Audio Quality: Very good. Best of models tested.
  
  
  Sony MDR-NC11A
  1) Noise Canceling: Best
  2) Comfort: Middle
  3) Audio Quality: Middle
  
  I exchanged the Soundshield 501's for the Sony's. I have now owned them for 3 weeks and 8 flights. One important factor I have not included until now is the portability of the products. For me, traveling light is also important. The Sony's have a much smaller storage envelope and can even fit in your pocket. This is valuable for travel. I would be willing to lug around a larger package to get better noise canceling, so I did not include it as a factor until now.
  
  Noise Canceling: Very effective. In another league beyond Bose. Significantly better than Brookstone. They do produce an audible hiss when the NC circuitry is turned on. This is annoying, but is still less noise than the other 2 models failed to cancel.
  
  Comfort: OK. The choice of earbud sizes has really helped. The small work well for me. They do not work their way loose as the NC10's did. They are also more comfortable while wearing. Still some discomfort in the canal is noticed. Overall, the Bose are a bit more comfortable. The Sony's do have the benefit of not messing up your hair before your meeting.
  
  Audio Quality: Very good. Much better than Bose. Very close to Brookstone.
  
  Bottom line: After trying the models mentioned above, I still have not found the perfect product. I definately prefer the Sony's. If Sony can eliminate the hissing, then they would be perfect.
  
  
  
• it's too expensive..
  By AGP8A2F5LP0GG on 2005-11-20
  Also, it has pretty crappy sound, with same amount of money i spended on this headphone. i should've bought Shure Ec4 or Sennheiser's Noise Cancelling headphone..these headphones are much more suporior than this Bose...I DO NOT RECOMMAND THIS HEADPHONE!!! Well, depend on your taste, if you like the expensive and crappy sound you go right ahead. I won't stop you.. If you're smart, you should think twice. Think very carefully.
  
  
• Sound awesome but overpriced
  By A1BGBYFKE19PKU on 2005-11-25
  I have owned a pair of these for a few months and can say that these are the best sounding headphones that I have ever owned. However the headphones feel cheaply constructed and pick up ear-piercing interfence in the powered-speaker side when you're near to a cellphone or when you pass by cellphone relay tower as I do on my commute home everyday. They are also pretty bad for walking around since they pick up evey step you take unless you turn up the sound to try and block it out. But isn't part of the point of owning Noise Cancelling headphones that you shouldn't have to turn up the sound too much so that you don't damage your hearing? At this price you just expect the perfect set of headphones.
  
  
• Audiophile spent the day with these...
  By A2NOSR501QICRB on 2006-01-04
  I've heard a thing or two about these, and I'm somewhat of a headphone officianado. They can't be QUITE as bad as all that, can they? Borrowed them from a buddy to find out.
  
  Yes, they are quite that bad. Muddy, grainy, unbalanced sound with bass that can't really figure out precisely where it is. And why on earth do they hiss slightly? If you want isolation and have some cash, try a pair of Beyerdynamic DT 770-80s, or the Audiotechnica A900.
  
  And just a note to "Cathy"...
  The price isn't the problem here. I've got a headphone rig worth over $800. Beyerdynamic DT 880, Grado SR 60, Beyerdynamic DT 770, a Headsave PPA amp, and an EMU-0404 soundcard. I'm willing to spend the money for a good pair of headphones. I love headphones. I can't speak for other Bose products, having not heard them... but these stink. You can do a ton better for $300.
  
  
• Expensive...but worth it.
  By A2IBJOHZA8X7MP on 2006-03-15
  I know $[...] for headphones is outrageous, but it all came clear once I put them on. The Bose Quiet Comfort 2 (QC2) noise canceling headphones deliver Bose quality sound along with Bose quality noise cancellation. They are the same price as my ipod and to be honest, I would rather have these with a CD player then an ipod with ipod ear buds. I can't stand ear buds. I brought these headphones on a plane to Florida last week (~3hrs) and when I turned them on, the airplane noise diminished to almost nothing. When I played music, I couldn't hear anything except for the music, which had amazing sound. The bass does not deteriorate like other headphones in the air. The flight was so nice, that when we landed, I didn't want to leave. The only thing that the QC2 don't cancel out is human voice, which is good. That way, you'll hear if the pilot announces that you flight is rerouted say to New Zeeland! Just kidding.
  That was the way there. On the way back, some parents brought there 4 yr old son on board who, as you can imagine, was quite boisterous. Quite boisterous throughout the entire flight in fact. The headphones cancelled his crying. Thank God! When in the air listening to music, if I closed my eyes, it was like sitting in a house listening to an expensive speaker system. The Bose headphones are the most comfortable headphones I've ever warn. I can wear them for hours without getting a headache. I think next Bose should design airplane seats!
  Specs: The QC2 has one microphone placed right by each of your ears that anticipate unwanted background noises, and transmits canceling waves. They also contain triport technology, which allows the headphones to reproduce low tones without adding weight to the headset. Also the headphones have a detachable cord which allows you to just use the headphones for noise cancellation without having to deal with a cord. On the detachable cord is a hi/low adjustment for portable and non-portable devices. The headphones come with an almost hard shell carrying case which includes a removable pouch, 2 human ear replicas to put the headphones around, a whole set of Bose courtesy cards for you to give out to possible customers, and an external pocket. The headphones use 1 AAA battery which is supposed to last for 35 hrs of use. On the right cup of the headphones is a light indicator that is on when the headphones are on and flashes when the battery is going to last for about 15 minutes more.
  
  Pros: Great sound, great noise cancellation, great amount of comfort.
  Cons: Price, the carrying case does not have a compartment to hold the detachable cord.
  Suggestion to customer: Before I bought the QC2, I owned the Bose triport. These headphones have the same triport technologies that the QC2 has, and are almost equal in sound quality. They are great headphones that go for half the price of the QC2. To read more on the Bose triport headphones, click on the "see all my reviews" next to my name.
  
  

• Bose® QuietComfort® 3 Acoustic Noise Cancelling® Headphones
• Bose TriPort In-Ear Headphones - Headphones ( ear-bud ) - black
• Audio-Technica ATH-ANC7 QuietPoint Active Noise-Cancelling Headphones
• Bose SoundDock digital music system for iPod (Black)
• Bose TriPort In-Ear Headphones - Headphones ( ear-bud ) - black