Nikon D40x 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens Reviews

• Unless you are a sport journalist, I don't think you can go wrong with this camera

  
  By A1TQZUSOU22E9M on 2007-05-03
  The 10 Megapixel Nikon D40x is targeted for those who want a relatively compact and light camera yet having most of the important SLR features. The D40 is priced reasonably. In my opinion, if you are still considering whether to get a point and shoot camera or a DSLR, the D40x will be a better choice than any point and shoot camera. But if you are already deciding to get a DSLR or you want more control of the picture taking experience, then I would recommend you to also test the D50, D70s and/or D80 first before deciding to buy the D40x (or the D40). I want you to make sure that you know what you will get (and not get) with the D40x. Don't get me wrong though, the D40x is an awesome camera, and I don't think you will regret buying one. There are some limitation with the D40x which shouldn't bother most people, for example, the D40x doesn't have dedicated button to change picture quality, white balance or ISO settings (which generally only professional/enthusiast will care). Once you understand (and accept) its limitation, the D40x is a potent and exciting photography machine.
  
  Just like all its (DSLR) siblings, the D40x powers on instantly and take pictures with almost no shutter lag which are the major advantages of a DSLR over a point and shoot camera. In addition to the P,S,A,M mode, the picture quality of the auto settings (auto, child mode, landscape etc) are also very good. With 3 frames per second you can capture movement progress in sports like football, basketball, baseball etc. Also great to photograph your family or child (child mode). The D40x is a great all around camera.
  
  Some notable new features:
  1. Auto (no flash) mode. Without this mode the flash will pop-up (on all other pre-programmed mode) even when you don't want to use flash (which can be annoying). The internal flash will not pop up automatically with the P,S,A,M settings.
  2. In camera editing capability such as black and white, sepia and some filter effects etc. While sounds gimmicky, these features are useful especially for those who doesn't have Adobe Photoshop (or other image editing software).
  3. 10.2 Megapixel sensor for 3782 X 2592 on large image size settings. This is enough to print larger than 13 X 19 Inch.
  4. 3 frames per second (vs 2.5 for D40)
  
  To date, D40 and D40x are the smallest and lightest among all the Nikon DSLR (even smaller than the Canon Rebel XT/XTi, however the D40 and D40x is more ergonomics). I believe that choosing a camera that fits comfortably with your hands is important. Therefore, I recommend people to test the camera before buying (even if you want to buy online, please do go to a physical store and test the camera first whenever possible).
  
  The D40/D40x has only 3 (horizontal) autofocus point (5 for D50 and 11 for D80). If you know "The Rule of Thirds", the additional AF points above and below the center focus point (available in D50 and D80) are handy to help create the horizontal third line. However, the 3 horizontal AF point in D40/D40x is still helpful to create the vertical third line. Also one can focus with the middle AF point and after the focus is lock then move the frame upwards/downwards to create the horizontal third line. Just make sure the exposure level is still accurate when you move the frame after you lock the focus.
  
  About the 18-55mm II AF-S kit lens: A good lens producing sharp photos (though not a very fast lens). Also decent for close-up/macro photography. Lens uses internal focus technology and focusing operation is silent. A very decent kit lens.
  
  Lens compatibility: Notice that with D40/D40x, autofocus function will not work for non AF-S/AF-I lens. If you already have non AF-S/AF-I Nikon lenses and want a backup or replacement camera, you will be better off buying D50, D70s or D80. If you buy the D40, it will be convenient to stick with AF-S and AF-I type lenses. I'm not sure why Nikon choose this route for the D40/D40x (whether to enable smaller size camera or from now on Nikon will only make AF-S lens compatible camera). There are a lot of good Nikon AF-S lenses (price range added: low, medium, high) that are fully compatible with the D40/D40x such as:
  
  - Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX (L)
  - Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX (L)
  - Nikon 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED IF AF-S DX (L)
  - Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX (L)
  - Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S DX VR (M)
  - Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX (L)
  - Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX VR (L)
  - Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR (M)
  - Nikon 12-24mm f/4G ED IF AF-S DX (M)
  - Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S (H)
  - Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX (H)
  - Nikon 28-70mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S (H)
  - Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR (H)
  - Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro (M)
  - And several other expensive prime tele/zoom lens like 200-400mm, 300m, 400mm, 500mm, 600mm.
  
  High priced lens ($1000+) are usually pro level lens which usually have better construction, faster (f-stop), and produce better quality picture. However, often times, lower price lens will serve your needs just fine. I think it is important to know what you want to use the camera for before deciding which camera and lens to buy.
  
  Image quality of the D40x is very good which is #1 factor that I look for in a digital camera.
  
  Here are the pros and cons of the D40x in my opinion:
  
  Pros:
  1. Nice out of the camera result picture quality
  2. 10.2 Megapixel sensor
  3. Compact size and light weight
  4. Large and bright 2.5 inch LCD
  5. 3 frames per second
  6. B/W, Sepia, several more in-camera editing features.
  7. Instant power on, fast autofocus and no shutter lag
  8. Noise is acceptable at high ISO settings. Auto ISO settings available.
  9. Great battery life (500+ on a single charge. 1000+ if flash is not used).
  10. Auto (flash off) mode available
  
  Cons:
  1. No direct button to change QUAL, WB and ISO settings
  2. Grip comfortably but might be a bit too small for some people
  3. No top LCD and no front command dial
  4. Autofocus will not work with non AF-S or non AF-I lenses (such as the 70-300m G and 50mm f/1.8D lens)
  5. No AF/MF switch (have to use the switch on the lens)
  6. Only 3 autofocus point
  7.
  8. No night landscape mode in pre-programmed settings
  9. 1/200 flash sync (which is slower than D40's 1/500)
  10. No depth-of-field preview button
  
  Comparing D40x with the D40. I personally prefer the D40 over the D40x due to only minor improvement on the D40x. If you will do a lot of cropping and print larger than 13 X 19 Inch then it might make sense to get the D40x, otherwise use that $200 (price difference) to invest in SB-400 flash or better/more versatile lens (such as upgrading the kit lens to 18-70mm AF-S or 18-200mm AF-S VR or add the 55-200mm AF-S VR zoom lens). If you shoot sports or fast action (in continuous/burst mode) and need more than 3 frames per second then get the D200 with 5 FPS. For enthusiast, 2.5 FPS (D40) or 3 FPS (D40x) is good enough in my opinion.
  
  In conclusion, the D40x is perfect for those who want high quality pictures, more control (than a point and shoot camera), and have a DSLR experience (instant power on and no shutter lag), without having to carry a bulky camera. And unless you are shooting sports/actions professionaly (which faster focusing processor, faster frames per second and larger memory buffer might be needed), the D40x is pretty much all you will need.
  
  Happy Photographing!
  
  
  

• Not for Soccer Moms, Sports Shooting, Others will Love It.

  
  By A2EUXDOZ3M6EBQ on 2007-06-28
  
  The D40x is a hard camera to rate because for some, it will be a 5 star camera, but others will regret their decision to buy this camera. If you are in the 5 star group, you will LOVE the D40x. But . . . because of a decision Nikon made to save $$$ by leaving out an autofocus driver out of the camera body, if you want to add a lens to shoot your kid playing soccer, the D40x is a potentially bad choice, and you may be a dead man walking. Let me explain:
  
  The 5 Star buyer:
  
  If you are moving up to a digital SLR, and want nothing more than to use the kit lens (which is very good), then you will LOVE this camera: it is light, feels good in the hand, and puts out better looking JPEG files than the more expensive D70 and D50 cameras, and rivals the D80 at half the cost. At 10.2 megapixels, there is plenty of resolution to crop and still have a great image to print.
  
  Also, this is a very light weight camera which feels great in the hand, and is extremely easy to set up and use.
  
  Digicam upgraders will love the ability to shoot at 3 frames per second, meaning you can set up the camera to take multiple exposures if you hold down the trigger. Digital exposures are free, so shooting in this manner gives you a better chance of hitting the perfect shot when photographing the kids.
  
  If you intend to use this camera for general travel and around-the-house kid pictures, the D40x is a GREAT choice, and I think you will be a very, very happy camper.
  
  The 2 Star buyer:
  
  You want a camera for sports or telephoto shots of nature/birding. This is not the camera for you, and here is why: the D40x has a DIFFERENT lens mount than every other Nikon DSLR which came before it. To save costs, Nikon left an autofocus driver out of the camera body, which means you must buy special/more expensive add-on lenses with the autofocus driver built into the lens itself.
  
  Why is this significant? Because of the 200 lenses made for Nikon DSLRs by Nikon, Sigma, Tokina, and others, only 20 or so work with the D40x with autofocus - something most amateurs will need to shoot sports and day to day photos. Many of Nikon's own consumer grade lenses, such as the 70-300mm G Zoom (Street price $150), will not autofocus with the D40x. As a practical matter, this means that if you want an autofocus lens to shoot junior playing soccer, you must spend $515 for a zoom lens, the fantastic, yet pricey Nikon 70-300mm VR Zoom. That is almost as much as what you paid for the camera itself.
  
  Now, to be fair, Nikon has also introduced the $250 (street) Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200 mm lens, but that lens (1) will not give you the reach you will want to shoot sports, (2) is a tad slow autofocusing for sports, and (3) the lens speed will limit you to shooting on fairly bright days.
  
  The D40x is significantly limited in the number of lenses it will accept, and you really need to think about these limitations before purchasing. Moreover, what if your intentions change and want to pick up a cheap zoom for occasional use? With the D40x, you can't (cheapest compatible lens is $250), and I really think this is a significant limitation on this camera. That said, if Nikon sticks to this mount, the lens manufacturers will (over time) follow, so 2 years from now, there may be a wealth of new lenses for this mount.
  
  But hey, if you are in group 1, this is a 5 star purchase, and you will be a very happy camper. Good luck!
  
  

• Shame on Nikon Too

  
  By A1OWROB7ZLPIYQ on 2007-09-29
  I have owned, and still own Nikon equipment since 1965. I have taught Photography for 38 years, I get to see every camera on the market through my adult students (post college). I recommend Nikon cameras most often, BUT NOT THIS ONE, this camera only focuses with lenses that have a motor within the lens. That renders all "D" series lenses obsolete for auto focusing with this camera model. This Camera has no Depth-of-field preview button, which is vital to understanding focus. Kit lens is to "slow" to allow you to take a photograph without camera shake, in your kitchen, unless you use a flash. Your kitchen is usually the brightest room in your house. Look elsewhere, with photographic equipment, You get what you pay for. Try Nikon's D80 with a 50 mm f1.8D lens.
  
  

• Solid performer, just a few catches.

  
  By A2UQK3DAZ8NO2T on 2007-04-22
  The D40x is a 10 megapixel upgrade to their popular D40 camera (6mp), and this package features the same 18-55 zoom.
  
  As with it's 6mp twin, the D40x is one of the smallest DSLRs on the market, but is shaped as well for the hands as any of the smaller series (such as the Canon XTi). Trade-offs for the smaller size are a less powerful battery and a smaller viewfinder.
  
  Another strong feature is the editing you can do in the camera itself after you've taken the picture. This is truly handy if you're on the road but need to make some prints for clients or family.
  
  Compared to the slightly more expensive Canon XTi, the D40x's AF system is a very simple 3-point system vs. 9-point for the Canon. Since focusing a metering are also tied together, this might give the Canon an edge in more difficult lighting situations. Additionally, the Canon offers a sensor cleaning feature lacking on all Nikons. The Canon, however, does not have the editing featues of the D40x. These two will be joined at 10mp, very small DSLR, by the Olympus Evolt E-410.
  
  The only catch for the D40x is that it does not feature a focusing motor inside the body. That pretty much limits your selection of autofocusing lenses to some Nikon and a few Sigma lenses today. Nikon's own 55-200 VR is a terrific value, if it's enough range, but there are no $200 AF 75-300 zooms that will work in autofocus today. If you have older Nikon AF lenses, you might look at the larger but superior D80, which still features the motor in the body.
  
  A very nice, small DSLR, at a very reasonable price. And the pictures are pretty darn good, too!
  
  
  
  

• Great camera, tought lens decisions

  
  By A3856FA2O4FXXF on 2007-10-08
  As I am writing this, there are 43 reviews of the D40x that cover just about every feature of this camera (and one very important non-feature: lens compatibility). I agree with most positive reviews: this is a very fast, light, easy to use DSLR with a great battery life.
  
  The D40x is a very good camera, and a good choice as long as you do not have a large collection of old Nikon lenses. As many other reviewers have noted, this camera only autofocuses with Nikon AF-S or Sigma HSM lenses. (In Nikon-ese, "AF-S" means "has a built in motor to focus." "HSM" means the same thing in Sigma-speak.) Unless you take lots of shots of inanimate objects, you'll probably find manual focus a huge inconvenience. Luckily, there are a good selection of AF-S lenses. Sigma makes a fixed-focus 30mm f1.4 lens if you need to take indoor pictures without a flash; Nikon makes a fantastic selection of other lenses. Don't worry about this limitation unless you already have a lot of Nikon lenses.
  
  However, when I bought this camera a few months ago, I was faced with an important question: which lens should I buy with this camera? Amazon offers at least four different options: (a) body only, (b) body plus Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens, (c) body plus Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Nikkor Zoom Lens and 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens, and (d) body plus Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras. What is a buyer to do?
  
  I went with option (b), and later bought the extraordinary Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens. Today, I might buy the body alone. Let me explain why:
  
  When I bought the camera, the difference in price between options (a) and (b) was about thirty dollars. I felt that it was certainly worth that amount of money to get a small, light general purpose lens. This way I could buy the camera, figure out how I wanted to use it, and upgrade lenses later. You can certainly take some very good pictures with the cheap kit lens, and you may like having a fast-focusing, lightweight zoom lens anyway.
  
  I considered option (c), the two lens package, but decided against it for two reasons. First, Nikon makes two 55-200mm zoom telephoto lenses: the one included in this kit, and a second version with vibration reduction. The VR version is only slightly more expensive. I find that VR is an essential feature in a long zoom lens; it helps a lot in taking long distance shots that stay in focus. Furthermore, because of the way this kit is priced, you may find that it is actually cheaper to buy the body and lenses separately!
  
  I also considered option (d), but decided against this after reading reviews of the Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens. Reviewers were often disappointed with this lens.
  
  So, in a nutshell, here is my advice to prospective buyers:
  
  (a) Check prices, carefully. Sometimes, the kits are great deals. Sometimes they are not.
  
  (b) The cheapest kit lens is a great lens for the price, but not a great lens. It focuses quickly, and it's very light, but the zoom range is a little short and it has some significant optical flaws.
  
  (c) If you can afford it, get the Nikon 18-200mm lens. It's better than any of the lenses that are included in the kits.
  
  (d) Consider a cheap lens kit and a flash like the Nikon SB-400 AF Speedlight for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras. If you take lots of indoor pictures, a bounce flash will do more for your pictures than a pricier lens. (Incidentally, I love this flash: it's small and light, and the battery life is terrific.)
  
  (e) I decided to buy the cheapest body available and more expensive lenses. Cameras, unfortunately, have turned into computers: they are replaced by new models that are twice as good every 18 months. Lenses, on the other hand, have not. Spend your money on lenses, not cameras.
  
  (f) There are good reviews of lens options on different web sites. In particular, check out http://www.cameralabs.com/, who did a review comparing all the Nikon kit lenses. You can also try typing "nikon lens review" into a search engine.
  
  I hope that helps. Happy shooting!
  
  
• Comparing the Nikon D40, D80 and D200
  By A29TZ0192IY8IZ on 2007-06-06
  As long as you know what you're buying, it's hard to go wrong with Nikon's digital SLRs. They all take beautiful photographs. Even the basic D40 will give you professional-level clarity, color and focus.
  
  There are four Nikon digital SLRs in the consumer market. Here's how they compare:
  
  The entry-level camera is the Nikon D40. It's a basic SLR camera that takes high-quality 6.1 megapixel (MP) photos. It has an automatic flash, eight programmed exposure modes, three focus areas and a self-timer with four settings (2, 5, 10 and 20 seconds). The D40 can shoot about two-and-a-half images per second and take about 450 photos on each battery charge. Its ISO range is 200-1600. On the downside, it has a plastic body, a semi-mechanical shutter and only accepts Nikon's newer AF-I or AF-S lenses unless you want to manually focus each shot. It weighs about a pound. The basic D40 kit is Nikon D40 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens.
  
  One step up from the D40 is the D40x, shown on this page. Using the same body as the D40, it shoots 10.2 MP photos. It can take about three images per second, get about 500 photos out of a single charge, has an ISO range of 100-1600 and has a fully electronic shutter. As shown above, Amazon offers the D40x as body-only and in a variety of sets.
  
  A major step up is the D80. About a third-inch wider and four ounces heavier than the D40, it uses the same processor but works fully with any Nikon SLR lens. It has 11 focus areas, a depth-of-field preview in its optical viewfinder, white-balance bracketing and a self-timer that can be set for any time between 2 and 20 seconds. Incredibly, you can get up to 2000 shots on each battery charge, assuming you don't use the LCD screen much. Amazon sells the D80 body separately (Nikon D80 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera (Body only) and in various lens-package deals.
  
  Finally, the D200 is simply one of the best cameras Nikon has ever built. A half-inch taller and a third-inch wider than the D80, it weighs nearly two pounds thanks to its all-metal body. Designed for more advanced users, it does away with all but the standard programmed exposure mode and instead shoots 5 frames per second, outstanding for a 10 MP ISO 100 camera, especially at this price. It uses Compact Flash cards. In many ways the D200 is a professional camera at a consumer price. This is the camera I use for all but my most demanding shots. From a professional standpoint it really increases your productivity compared to the far bulkier D2 models, as it is so much easier to carry and position. Amazon sells the D200 body by itself (Nikon D200 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) and in various package deals.
  
  I'm not including the professional D2 models here, as explaining all their features would drag this review on forever. Besides, from what I've heard the new D3 should be released this fall.
  
  
• Nikon D40X - not a pro camera, but still very good
  By A2BUQ240COLAOP on 2007-05-28
  I did a dumb thing last Tuesday - while at the airport, I had my fully outfitted Canon D20 rig - battery grip pack, 4 batteries, several lenses, remote trigger, external flash, 3 GB CF mini hard drive card and a case full of other stuff. While on the shuttle train to my gate it was on my shoulder on the seat. When the train stopped, I jumped off with my laptop, but the camera bag had slipped off onto the seat - I didn't notice the weight change on my shoulder. As the door was closing, I saw my camera drive off in an empty train to pick up more travellers. $3000+ in camera gear soon to be in the hands of a new owner :-( I called Lost and Found, but let's face it - it's gone for good. Oh well - I make good money, and it's just 'stuff' - what else can you do, ya know? I can only say I'm glad I didn't have my GPS, point-and-shoot, 700p PDA cell phone and car keys in the same case like I normally do when I travel (I fly a lot). This one day, all the other stuff was in my laptop case.
  
  Soooo.... today I bought the Nikon at Costco in a 2 lens kit for about $970. I fully knew it wasn't the pro grade that my Canon was. But I just wanted to 'get back in it' as I take a LOT of photos for work and pleasure.
  
  The D40x takes GREAT photos - but I quickly found a few limitations that I have not seen posted. There is no direct entry for color temperature. Since I shoot semi professionally, and use a color temperature meter on a regular basis, I feel this is important. With the Nikon, you can only set the 'lighting type' - outdoors, tungsten, flourescent, etc. No direct entry of color temp in Kelvins. Also, there is no instant access to ISO - another important feature the D40x lacks. There is no external sync PC connection for pro flash gear (I use Novatron flash packs in manual mode). You have to buy a hot shoe adapter to get this - no biggie, but it's more money and not included.
  
  But I will say it's WAY faster than the Canon D20 was - very quick to start, and no lag between shots. The ergonomics are better in some ways - it's WAY lighter, but a little small. There's no LCD on top, and only one encoder wheel (which limits how many changes you can make quickly). The built-in editing and such are fine if you want that stuff in the camera. I don't - I use Photoshop and do all that stuff on the computer. Also, I normally shoot RAW + Large JPEG - the D40X only allows RAW + 'basic' JPEG - you cannot do 1:4 large JPEGs and RAW at the same time - I consider this a limitation, as it means I must do the conversion in the computer instead of just dumping both formats onto the editing disk. For point and shoot, it isn't an issue.
  
  I think it's a great semi-pro camera - if you are looking for a GOOD 'point and shoot' this might be the ticket. If you are looking for a GOOD DSLR, I'd go for the Nikon D80 instead. I chose the D40X on the thought that next year, the D80 class will be 20 Megapixels, and I'll just hang on until then to move back into a pro-class DSLR. So my issues really relate to the fact I didn't want to jump right back in with another $3000 to get to where I was on Tuesday. I did NOT expect the D40x to be pro grade - it's a VERY good camera for what it is.
  
  Oh, and if you happen to have 'found' a Canon D20 camera and bag on a train to the south terminal of the Seattle airport on May 22 at 7:30 AM, I'll happily give you a VERY generous reward for returning it to me :-)
  
  
• Great 1st DSLR... but if you want to progress...
  By A231HAEWH5RTMJ on 2007-08-13
  I bought the D40x in June 2007, and learnt the use of the cam, and it is a brilliant great first DSLR camera, but when you are faced with certain shots you would like to have, you would start thinking of how to capture that shot, and when you find that your camera does not support that function, you can either live with it, or it is time to upgrade. Before I go on, I must say that the D40x is a really brilliant camera for the price you pay. The kit lens that comes with the camera, though plasticky, is a also great performer!
  
  Most reviews would tell you all that it can do, but here, I'll tell you more about what it cannot do that I would like it to have. You can read other reviews on all the functionality and great stuff the D40x has.
  
  1. It is limited in the types of lenses it can use for auto focusing, i.e. the AF-S lenses. Because Nikon took a focusing motor out of the camera body (which makes it lighter), it now needs lenses which has an internal focusing engine. The Nikon range with this is the AF-S lenses.
  
  This would mean that you cannot use the AF or AF-D lenses for auto focusing. It can still do metering, but not auto focusing. Tokina (at the writing of this review update) do not make lenses that can auto focus on the D40/x cameras, and Sigma has a HSM range that can work, and Tamron released in 2008 some lenses that have in-built motor that can auto focus with the D40/x camera. These AF-S lenses are more expensive, so you may spend less on the body, but more on the lenses, unless you are satisfied with the kit lens or the lower range of Nikon DX lenses.
  
  The AF-S fast lenses (i.e. lenses with large aperture) are very expensive. Hence, one of my gripes is that I cannot fully use the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 lenses on this camera.
  
  2. It cannot support auto bracketing. In the Nikon web page, the specifications for the auto bracketing looks misleading. When I searched for it, I found out that it does not support it. Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB) takes a number of consecutive shots at different exposures (e.g. -2EV, 0, +2EV) and when you go home, you can do a post processing on these 3 shots. This is the same for Auto White-balance Brackting (AWB) where it takes multiple shots with different white balance settings.
  
  This means that to do bracketing, you would need to do it the old fashioned way of taking one shot, change the settings, take another shot, change the settings, then take a 3rd shot. By doing this manually, you are more prone to error or shifting the camera when you make the manual adjustments.
  
  Why do you want such a feature? Basically, imagine a picture of a great blue sky and a clear foreground of a subject you are taking. Without different exposures, you would either get the blue sky you want but a drak foreground subject, or a right exposure of the foreground but not the blue sky you want. The 3 pics taken in the bracketing allows you to do post processing on Photoshop to join the 2 exposures together.
  
  3. The white balance adjustments are presets with +/- 3 for each preset. It does not support the kelvin color temperature scale in manual white balance adjustment.
  
  
• Great Camera
  By A35SQKG09EQYCZ on 2007-06-12
  I have been into photography about forty years. I decided to move up to a digital SLR. Checked all the data I could find on the Canon xti and the Nikon D40x.It seemed to me the cameras were about the same, with the Nikon having the edge on lens quality and the spot meter which I have always liked. My next step was to try them on for size, so I went to my local Sam's Club. To me, the Nikon felt much better in my hands. You should try the same test, after all you are spending a fair amount of money and probably intending to keep the camera for awhile. In the past, I have owned both Nikon and Canon cameras, and usually judge them about the same. I would strongly suggest that you purchase the 55mm-200 lens for this camera. After owning this camera for about two months I would tell you I am very satisfied with it in every way, picture quality, weight, feel, and performance. The only way I would recommend the Canon xti is if you already have Canon lenses that are compatible with it. The older Nikon lenses are not compatible on the d40x. Hope this review helps your decision.
  
  
• Very good 1st dSLR camera...
  By A303YO1B5DKTHT on 2007-04-07
  Going from using point-and-shoot digicams to the D40x is a nice 1st step. I love taking pictures and have always wanted an easy to use 1st-time dSLR. The D40x fits the bill. The differences with the D40 may be minor but the 10 Megapixels surely will benefit those who tend to crop pictures later, as I do. The 18-55 mm lens that I got with the camera is limiting. I take a lot of close-up shots so its fine now but I already have my eyes set on the 55-200 AF-S DX VR Lens.
  
  The built in tools make the D40x very easy to use and quite intutive. I didn't even read the manual yet and feel like I can just use it for reference later.
  
  SD memory does not come with the camera, it should I think. I got myself a 2GB Kingston Ultra which works like a charm. An extra battery comes in handy too.
  
  The D40 is a fine camera by itself, about $200 cheaper than the "x" but I prefer to have 10 MPs to work with (personal preference). I will invest in better lenses later. I will use this time to master the camera first.
  
  It was either the Canon Rebel XTi or the Nikon D40x for me. In the end, I settled on the Nikon. Accessories/Lenses are a bit on the cheaper side. Also, I have lots of SD memory so didn't feel like getting new CF just for the XTi.
  
  I am very satisfied with my purchase and you will be too.
  
  Good luck.
  
  
• I Love my D40X
  By A1J5U8UXMJJ9JT on 2007-07-17
  I've had this camera for 1 month now. The funny thing is that I purchased the same one from [...] and wound up returning it. Here is why:
  
  [...] sells a kit with the D40X, a Lexar 1 GB memory card, the Nikon Bag, 2 instructional DVD's, the 18-55 and 55-200 lenses.
  
  The problem was that I wanted the 55-200 VR lens (which is a much better lens). New it's not that much more money...but to sell the kit lens and buy the VR version would have put me out extra $. Also the Lexar memory card is not as good as the Extreme III card that I wanted and ultimately got from Amazon. Last was the warranty. [....] changed their return policy now after 90 days you're on your own - they do not offer any extensions or service contracts, even at an additional cost. I checked with Nikon and an additional 2 years of coverage would have been $100. I ultimately got 3 additional years through Amazon for considerably less.
  
  In the end I picked out all the components from Amazon and built my "kit" much better than the [...] version for basically the same money.
  
  As far as the camera itself there are some features that I wish it had, such as:
  
  Drawbacks:
  No Exposure Bracketing
  Limited to 3 focus points
  No Depth of field preview
  
  Knowing that I would miss these features I still purchased this camera (twice) because:
  
  Positive:
  It feels/handles great
  The lenses (although limited) offer a great bang for the buck
  The menu system is user friendly and a pleasure to use
  The results - This camera allows me to take great pictures
  
  Conclusion:
  If you have a lot of film SLR experience consider the Canon XTI
  If you are moving up from a digital point and shoot and do limited or no photo editing - get the D40 & if you crop your images for print get the D40X
  
  
  
• Amazing camera
  By ALPDBY0NZH9YI on 2007-05-11
  I bought the D40X in Israel since Amazon will not ship it outside of the US (still can't understand why).
  I went for the kit (18-55) and added the AF-S 55-200 VR and the tiny yet impressive SB-400 flash.
  I was instantly amazed: perfect colors, always in focus (and I mean always, even in zero light conditions), fast, easy and most of all, fun!
  Many friends asked me why I bought this model instead of the D40 - claiming that these two cameras are exactly the same (since more MP don't make a difference).
  So here are the main reasons:
  1. MP can make a difference, when you crop pictures. I must say that sometimes my compositions are not exactly exquisite (yeah...they sometimes suck...) so I need to crop pictures to make them look as I want them to. the extra 4 mp can make that difference (and they already did for me!)
  2. The D40X lowest ISO is 100 (200 for the D40). Again, not a big difference. However, ISO 200 may sometimes result in overexposure of white surfaces while the rest of the picture looks just great and that is so annoying!! I checked both sensitivity settings and 100 just looks better. Furthermore, why did Nikon decide to change this feature? I am sure that it has something to do with feedback they received from customers.
  3. It's newer than the D40. Yes, people may say that I am a victim of good marketing, but I strongly believe that Nikon released this version with improvements based on usage.
  I don't write Pros and Cons since I can't compare this camera to anything else at this level and price.
  Go get yourself one, you just can't go wrong.
  
  Avi
  
  
  
• Be Aware of Autofocus Limitation
  By A2POVYQCJCDXMJ on 2007-05-15
  First let me say, this camera is exceptional in the quality of image, feature-set, etc. I am writing this review only to warn others who are not aware: the autofocus feature in the D40 and D40x is different than all the other Nikon models.
  
  We purchased the Tamron AF 18-200mm 3.5-5.6, fully expecting the autofocus to work as witnessed/experienced on my friend's D70. Not so. My bad for not uncovering this little-written-about fact. (I would think, after having read hundreds of reviews, this would have been revealed). I knew the D40 & D40x required a Nikkor DX lens, but third party lenses don't have this specific identifier, and assumed "Autofocus Lens for Nikon" would meet that requirement on the D40(x) as well.
  
  Therefore, I am entering this tidbit for the record. Camera is a 5, (when coupled with the somewhat limited quantities of, and somewhat more expensive, lenses with autofocus built into the lens). Coming from the point-and-shoot world, I absolutely love this camera!
  
  Also for the record, I am sending the D40x back, (Thanks Amazon, your return policy and service is outstanding.)and upgrading to the D80 instead which works with all autofocus lenses, and besides, whats a couple hundred extra bucks when your buying this quality of camera. Can't wait to get the shipment, I fell in love with this camera the moment I started shooting.
  
  
  
  
• If you have epilepsy, this is not the camera for you
  By A33B44XPTW0WOA on 2007-04-25
  I always amazed that essentially no electronics company has ever heard of epilepsy or the Americans with Disabilities Act. Many epileptics can not tolerate blinking displays, etc. ( I wonder if there is anyone in the world, epileptic or not, that likes these unnecessary, infinitely annoying blinking icons? )
  
  With this camera, the Nikon D40X, any time there is some sort of out-of-range exception or problem, the help icon starts blinking furiously. I was having seizures with the very first use of this camera and I still can't use it because of seizures. There is no way of disabling this, naturally. ( I guess you could tape over the area where the icon is? )
  
  Blinking anything is a relic from the dark ages of electronics where there was only a single LED or a seven segment LED to indicate status. With modern LCD panels there are infinite alternative implementations such as a reverse video over the help icon, changing the color to, say, red, placing a "forbidden" ( the circle with the diagonal slash ) over the setting in error.
  
  At least Nikon could either provide an option to disable this "feature" or to provide an alternate display as mentioned in the previous paragraph? Anyways, I am tired of having my brain scrambled so this will probably be returned. I did not spend a thousand dollars for a camera that I can not safely use.
  
  With the Nikon D200 and the Nikon D80, you can configure them so that they are essentially epilepsy friendly. I have few problems with these two cameras and, if you are an epileptic, these are better cameras, too.
  
  BTW, the Canon Digital Rebel XTi ( which I, unfortunately, also have ), is also not suitable for epileptics as it has a similar problem to the Nikon D40X ( in it's case values blink and the EV display blinks if out-of-range ) The Canon is a more solid camera but it has fewer configuration options that the Nikon D40X.
  
  In the introductory paragraph I noted that essentially NO electronics company cares less about epileptics or the ADA. I have a whole box of advanced Texas Instruments calculators that I can't use. ( I requested accommodation a long time ago. No response, of course ) Considering that a couple of percent of the population has epilepsy, why won't these companies provide epilepsy friendly equipment?
  
  BTW, the one exception ( this is software ) is MatLab ( Math Works ). These people have gone out of their way to provide epilepsy friendly software and I would like to thank them for that.
  
  
• Nikon D40x
  By A1ECFZVAX6OO63 on 2007-05-16
  Easy for my wife to use as a point and shoot with convenience of the small footprint. Has all the features I would hope for as an experienced protographer and are intuitive to use- don't have to keep going back to the manual. Probaly did not need the 10 mpixel. Get the VR zoom as it will probably be your primary lens
  
  
• Lightest D-SLR Nikon D40X with 18-55 lens
  By A2ZPLOZC31S8GS on 2007-07-13
  I am an owner of Nikon D80 and bought D40x to my girlfriend. D40x is very handly and lightweight D-SLR I've seen. Image quality is identical to D80.
  
  
• For the price, this camera is amazing...
  By A3TSPLFYU2UMW0 on 2007-09-08
  Having been an enthusiastic (old style, but highest quality) SLR user for many years and having then switched to several digital compacts, from the disappointingly basic (circa 2000) through to the brilliant latest versions (in my case, a 7.0 megapixel Panasonic Lumix), I was intrigued when a professional photographer friend said I should check out the new generation of low cost digital SLRs and, in particular, the Nikon D40x... you'll enjoy it she said... and she wasn't wrong.
  
  First off, the price was only £150 or so more than a top end compact with the same 10 megapixel rating and, in the shop, it turned out to be smaller and much lighter than the old, dramatically more expensive SLRs I used to lug around... so, worth the plunge?
  
  A resounding yes, not only does it deliver the most beautiful, high quality photos but the control options over virtually all aspects of shot selection, including a powerful built in flash unit, are quite incredible - far better and much, much more comprehensive than I'd expected - with the ever present, wholly effective, compact-style "point & shoot" option if you can't be bothered. Plus, you get a large preview screen and extensive "in camera" editing features that allow a wide range of post-shot manipulation if you don't have access to your PC. Just amazing... everything, plus a huge amount more, that I got from my previous SLRs.
  
  Could it get any better? Well yes, because the stock Nikon autofocus zoom lens that comes with the camera (rated at 18-55 mm new digital style and equivalent to a just about perfect 26-83 mm old style) is now matched with Nikon's new, low cost, autofocus DX VR lens (rated at 55-200 mm new digital style and equivalent to 83-300 mm old style) which really does cut out camera shake to allow genuine "point & shoot" at its higher focal lengths. In other words, for a total cost of well under £600 I got a stunningly powerful and flexible camera plus a "tripod-less" combination of two lightweight autofocus Nikkor lens covering a full 26-300 mm range... which is nothing short of sensational for any "old style" SLR user like me.
  
  SLRs are a different world from compact cameras - you definitely can't fit them in your pocket - but for anyone wanting to move up to a higher level for not much more, or for anyone wanting to rediscover the lost joys of their SLR past at an incredibly cheap entry price, the Nikon D40x is a "must have" option... certainly it's got one more very happy user.
  
  
• One Great Camera
  By A3866PX4AU1E90 on 2007-10-17
  Some of the other reviews here and online have found fault with the kit lens and the lack of add ons like depth of field preview. If you need those upgrade to the D80. This is not a Pro camera and people should not look at it as such. It is an entry level DSLR designed for those moving from a point and shoot digicam.
  
  The controls are intuitive and easily mastered. I was up and running with full features after two hours of fiddling and that is the beauty of this camera. It is ergonomically perfect and your finger will naturally find the shutter button unlike the heavier Canon XTi. No it doesn't have an auto focus motor in the body and you must buy the Nikon auto focus lenses but my sense is those who buy this camera aren't the type who are willing to drop $500 - $2000 on a lens anyway.
  
  Bottom line is it creates great pictures with the kit lens and the quality of photos are leaps and bounds beyond the basic point and shoot digicam. If you're a Pro don't buy it, if you're not you can't go wrong with this little beauty.
  
  After the fact I also purchased the 55-200 VR lens
  Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Zoom Nikkor Lens
  With this and the kit lens you have everything you need to take great pictures in any situation.
  
  
• Great small DSLR
  By A2ZDJSBIK2LLGO on 2007-06-25
  I love the size and weight of the D40x. It feels good in my hands and hanging around my neck, even after a long day. The pictures are great and the user interface is relatively easy to use. My only complaints are the auto focus and the lens. When set to 'closest subject' (the default) the auto focus seems to focus on the wrong thing fairly often. I can switch to one of the other auto focus modes but these are less "automatic". My only other gripe is the lens. For the price delta between the D40x and the D40, I think it should have come with a bit better lens. I replaced the 18-55 with a Nikon 18-70 and now I've very happy.
  
  
• Best camera ever!
  By A2KVCADNQJL1C4 on 2007-07-15
  I have been a serious photographer for 58 years, most of these as a professional. I have seen some awesome cameras, but the Nikon D40x is by far the most phenominal I have ever used. I can't even imagine what would make this any better.
  My only complaint was that when I received my camera it came without a memory card. I should have picked up on this before it arrived, but I supposed that a camera "kit" would include everything I needed to get started. Not a big problem, but inconvenient.
  
  
  
• RAW pics not recognized by iPhoto 6.0.6 and Mac OS X 10.4.9
  By A3MBKRR3FZZFYV on 2007-04-15
  This review to let customers aware that the NEF (Nikon Raw format) is not recognized by iPhoto 6.0.6 running under Mac OS X 10.4.9. I returned the camera back to Amazon without any problem.
  
  Now, about the camera. I was surpised by the small size of the body itself. It felt good in the hand. The screen is very bright. However, I cannot say anything about the quality of the pictures in RAW since my software was not recognizing it.
  
  
• better than olympus evolt 500
  By A36B0KO1896PYJ on 2007-08-30
  Originally, I had purchased the Olympus e volt 500 because I had read the reviews and most seemed very favorable. I'm very new to photography and I didn't exactly know what I was buying exactly, I thought Olympus camera seemed simple enough for me to use and was a great price. After shopping for a camera for over 4 months, I ordered the evolt500. What a mistake! The camera took less than stellar photographs and was larger and looked like an older model camera with little to no modern edges. They were good but not WOW. After a few days of use, the Olympus began malfunctioning by shutting down randomly and the lcd screen would static. I shipped that back and amazon was wonderful enough to reimburse me for my shipping when the vendor didn't.
  
  Side Note: and another thing. I feel better when I purchase from Amazon as opposed to the other vendors. I may pay more (like I did for my Nikon d40x) but I think it's money well spent when I know that is something goes wrong past the first 15 days, my expensive investment is protected by someone other than the warranty.
  
  On a whim, I ordered the Nikon d40x. I had read the reviews and even walked over to best buy to test it out the camera. I still wasn't sure about the camera or what to expect. As soon as my camera arrived today (thanks, Amazon!) I opened the box and starting shooting. The pictures are amazing! Clear, crystal, sharp, and beautiful. The Olympus Evot500 (broken or not) does not hold a handle to the quality of shots the Nikon has to offer.
  
  Bottom line in any camera is the lens. The Nikkor has a higher quality lens, therefore the camera itself is an excellent choice.
  
  
  Nikon d40/ d40x VS. Canon RebelTi:
  I thought the canon would be easier to use because I have a powershot camera which makes me familiar with the format. The good news is that Nikon is also simple to use, if not a better format than canon. I couldn't be happier.
  
  The price is a bit more than what I wanted to pay for a dslr but I am very excited to start shooting, a feeling I never had while I owned the Olympus even before I discovered the defects in the merchandise. The camera itself did not inspire me to go out and capture photographs.
  
  The Nikon is fun, light, and sexy. Yes, I said sexy.
  
  As a beginner, I am thrilled about my purchase. I can't explain it... I feel like I have my creative juices boiling and I cannot wait to get started.
  
  If anyone is a beginner and is looking for the next step-up with as much quality, price and ease- you cant go wrong with a Nikon or its family of lenses.
  
  Happy Shooting!
  
  
  
• A little camera that can
  By ACV15RICDG91T on 2007-09-19
  I will assume if you're looking at buying this particular camera model, then: a. You are looking at upgrading from a point-N-shoot. Or, b. An intermediate to advanced photographer looking for a decent backup camera. Since I have owned this camera, I have been doing a lot of shooting with a friend of mine who happens to do photography for a living. My friend uses a Fujifilm S3 pro dSLR. Let me tell you, there isn't much difference in picture quality between the $700 d40x or $2,300 S3 pro when using the same lens. Both cameras are capable of producing almost identically amazing pictures. The main difference is when buying the d40x, you can get about the same quality photos for more than 3x cheaper than an average pro-level SLR camera.
  
  If there was one thing I would do over again, I would definitely buy the d40x as a camera body only. Not that the kit lens is bad, but it's rather limiting to your d40's potential. Having the chance to use Nikon's 18-200mm VR lens has made me a real believer of how important a really good lens is for great photography.
  
  My only major gripes about the d40x is the lack of adjustment buttons and no aperture dial the higher end dSLR's have. It can be somewhat annoying having to go into the camera's menu screen to make simple adjustments.
  
  The PRO's for sure outweigh the few CON's this camera has. It's a great dSLR camera to start out with. The only real limitations of the d40x will be the skill level of the person behind it.
  
  
  
  
  
• Easy to Use, Bargain Price, GREAT pictures
  By AQXTPDKQ6A8I on 2007-11-06
  First let me say, this is not a 'professional' camera. This is a prosumer camera, or a camera a professional might use as a backup. At 10.2 MP, the image quality is very good and you can blow pictures up and crop them, and still end up with a good image.
  
  I researched DSLRs for 2 weeks, reading about them and playing with them at Circuit City. I chose the Nikon D40x for the following reasons...
  1) Heavier construction, more durable than the Canon Digital Rebel XTi
  1a) Also feels better in my hand, which was a personal perference.
  2) .1 MP higher than the Canon
  3) 4.1 MP higher than the Nikon D40
  4) $350 less than the D80 (I would have preferred the D80, but I wasn't trying to spend $1500+ after getting more lenses and accessories).
  5) $632 for the D40x with the 18-55mm kit lens, which is much better than Canon's 28-55mm kit lens (which has horrible reviews).
  6) Nikkor Lenses-- cannot say enough about how important it is to have a good lens. Nikon seems to have the best lenses on the market.
  7) Takes an SD card-- the Canon takes a CF card. SD cards are cheaper for the same GBs
  8) Nikon has a better warranty situation and I heard they are very customer oriented.
  9) Nikon name is legendary in photography, and has the best and most easily available equipment.
  10) For $975 (several purchases on Amazon), I got the following: D40x with 18-55mm lens, 55-200mm VR (vibration reduction lens), Nikon ballistic bag, extra battery (2 total), Nikon guide to photography, 2GB Sandisk Extreme III SD card, Sandisk USB card reader, (2) different Nikon Lens protective padded pouches, Nikon Microfiber lens/screen rag, Nikon Pen style brush lens cleaner, Digital Recovery Software, and Digital Photo Editing Software. Also included was a free trial of Photoshop.
  
  All in all, this is a perfect camera for someone who is interested in DSLR photography but doesn't know squat about Aperture, ISO, Shutter Speed, F-stops, Manual Focusing, Bokeh, etc. This camera makes it easy to get introduced to DSLR photography without feeling overwhelmed. It additionally is great for someone who is on a budget-- such as a college or high school student who wants to pursue photography as a career. The quality of pictures is absolutely amazing for a $632 camera (and that includes a GOOD lens).
  
  
  
• Just what he wanted
  By A3A4DXQW3AO8CR on 2007-05-17
  I bought this camera for my boyfriend for his birthday. His last digital camera was nowhere near as extensive but this one has proved to be perfect for him. He's been reading thru the manual learning things here and there. It's his first digital SLR. It's not too complicated to take out of the box and begin shooting but it does have the bells and whistles to grow into for a beginner. I don't know that much about SLR cameras either but he's estatic and that's all that matters.
  
  
• WOW! 5 Stars is as high as allowed . . . .
  By AOXT1R95GXUKS on 2007-08-09
  This Digital SLR is the most incredible camera I've ever used. I was a SLR user, big into Minolta in the 90's. Sony seemed the way to go to be able to use my old Minolta lenses. Well, I am not disappointed that I went with my gut and bought this Nikon. The quality is second to none. The shutter lag is non-existent. It starts up in less then a half second. Is light weight and super comfy. I also bought the 55-200mm lens here on Amazon, with the VR (vibration reduction)and it is a great addition to the camera (remember you can't get the VR with the kit lens that can be bought with this camera. So, stay away from that as the VR zoom lens is a much better compliment to the Nikon D40x. And 10megs is incredible and the reviews in all the magazines are true... "this camera is the baby GENIUS".
  
  
• Nikon, as usual, yes. Amazon prices, NO.
  By A1Z3CDWZIYLVF2 on 2007-11-13
  I am quite pleased with the camera. After all , it is Nikon. I have had various Nikons since 1973. The delivery was quick and easy. However, a few days after I purchased the camera, I saw the same camera (and additional lens) is being sold for a whopping $ 215.00 less. So, buy the camera but not from the Amazon stores.Nikon D40x 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Lens
  
  
• Good aquisition
  By A3SR894E614FUL on 2007-06-12
  I am very satisfied with this product and the Amazon system. I bought by internet by Amazon and receive the equipment without problems. I happy.
  
  
• Great Camera
  By A27H1MTZ6IWTJE on 2007-10-10
  I purchased the D40x with 18-135 and took it to Colorado for high-country and fall foilage pictures. I've used a D80 for quite some time and I simply cannot tell the differece in the photos from the d40x and the d80. The 18-135 copy I have is actually a bit sharper than the 18-200 on the d80, with very little of the CA/distortion issues I've read about. The camera/lens combo is small, light and does a super job. Pictures are sharp, good color and contrast, and very manageable distortion at the wide end. About the only feature I miss from the D80 is more than one dedicated function button, but this is more than offset by the great rear screen display of shooting info - much better than the top screen on the 80
  
  
• Works like a charm
  By A1MCC6EQ1FZECY on 2007-04-14
  We needed a new digital camera when my Sony DSC-W1 focusing system developed complications after sending it thru the X-ray system. Did my searching online, and I liked detailed comparision of the entire Nikon digital camera line-up at the Nikon USA website. Decided to buy this camera over the D40 because of the 10+ mpixel capability, and the Canon line-up because I had other lenses from my other Nseries Nikon's that I could use.
  
  Pros: Light, easy to use and master. Good quality glass element lens. Excellent picture quality.
  Cons: The 2.5 inch viewer is for playback only. Does not work as a viewfinder.
  
  

• Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM APO HSM IF Macro Lens for Nikon SLR Cameras
• Adobe Photoshop CS4 Upgrade
• Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM Macro Lens for Nikon DSLR
• Induro Carbonflex 8x Tripod CX-114
• Induro Carbonflex 8x Tripod CX-213

• Nikon EN-EL9 Rechargeable Li-ion Battery for Nikon D40 and D40x Digital SLR Cameras
• Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Zoom Nikkor Lens
• Tiffen 52mm UV Protection Filter
• SanDisk 2 GB SDSDX3-2048-901 Extreme III SD Memory Card (Retail Package)
• Nikon D40/D40x Digital Field Guide